RESILIENCE AND VULNERABILITY: COMPETING SOCIAL PARADIGMS?

Authors

  • Daniela-Tatiana ȘOITU Prof.Ph.D., Department of Sociology and Social Work, Faculty of Philosophy and Social-Political Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Carol I 11, 700506, Iaşi, Romania

Keywords:

social work, vulnerability, social paradigm, coping, resilience, empowerment, transforming.

Abstract

Over the past decades has been developed an extensive debate around a new concept: that of resilience. Through our study we highlight the routes of the resilience impact on social work, în relation to vulnerability. Vulnerability, seen as a key paradigm in social work, is now rivalled by a postmodern approach, which emphasizes the ability of individual, of a group, of community, to cope, to adapt, and to transform. The main route is the one that change a problem focused approach to the one of transformation. From a relatively stable characteristic, as the first specialists believed on this issue, resilience is now addressed through researches that highlight the importance of the context, of the time, age, gender, and cultural experiences, in a multidimensional perspective. As a general feature, developed in different contexts, resilience is studied in these second and third generations of researches, in relation to different target groups and social situations. Despite a major interest now enjoys, resilience remains a complex concept, difficult to be harmonized in a global culture. Along with vulnerability, sometimes in competition with, resilience continues to develop as an important new paradigm in social protection.

References

American Psychology Association (2010). The Road to Resilience: What is Resilience [EB/OL]. Available at: www.apa.org/helpcenter/road-resilience.aspx (accesed February, 2015).

Asiminei, R. & Şoitu, C. (2014). Social economy: a shifting paradigm. Journal of Social Economy, IV(1), 17-30.

Béné, C., Godfrey Wood, R., Newsham, A. and M. Davies (2012). Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the Potentials and Limits of the Concept of Resilience in relation to Vulnerability Reduction Program. IDS Working Paper 405. CSP Working paper 006, Brighton UK.

Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. And Wisher, B. (1994). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. Routledge, London.

Devereux, S., and Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative Social Protection. IDS Working paper 232. Brighton. Available at:

http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/Wp232.pdf

Gallopin, G.C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 16, 293-303.

Garmezy, N. (1991). Resiliency and Vulnerability to Adverse Developmental Outcomes Associated with Poverty. The American Behavioral Scientist. 34(4), Sage Publications, 416-430.

Garmezy, N., Masten A.S. & Tellegen, A. (1984). The study of stress and competence in children: A building block for developmental psychopatology. Child development. 55, 97-111.

Human Development Report Office. Occasional Paper.

Ionescu, Ş. (ed.) (2013). Tratat de rezilienţă asistată. Trad. Sofia Manuela Nicolae, Ed. Trei, Bucureşti.

Marcu, F. (2000). Marele dicţionar de neologisme, Ed. Saeculum, București.

Patterson, (2002). Understanding family resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 233-246.

Rak, C.F. (2002). Heroes in the nursey: Three case studies in resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 247-260.

Richardson, (2002). The Metatheory of Resilience and Resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 307-321.

Rutter, M. & the English & Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team. (1998). Developmental catch-up, and deficit, following adoption after severe global early privation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 465-476.

Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial Resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Ortopsychiatry, 57, 316-331.

Ryff C.D. & Synger, B. (2003). Flourishing under fire: resilience as a prototype of challenged thriving. In Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well Lived (Keyes, C.L.M. & Haidt, J. Eds.) American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 15-36.

Smith-Osborne, A. (2007). Life Span and Resiliency Theory: A Critical review. Advances in Social Work. 8(1), 152-168.

Şoitu, D. (2013). Social investment: beyond vulnerability through empowerment. Journal of Social Economy/Revista de Economie Sociala, III(4), 21-39.

Şoitu, D. (2014). Resilience, relief and development – challenges of humanitarian aid education for universities. The experience in EUPRHA. Analele Ştiinţifice ale Univer-sităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iaşi (serie nouă). Sociologie şi asistenţă socială, VII(1), 129-133.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2012) Making Cities Resilient Report. Available at: http://www.unisdr.org/files/28240_rcreport.pdf (accesed March, 2015).

Wilkes, G. (2002) Introduction: Asecond Generation of Resilience research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 229-232.

Windle G. & Markland, D. (2008). Examination of a theoretical model for psycho-logical resilience in older people. Aging & Mental Health, 12, 285-292.

World Bank (2011). Resilience, Equity and Opportunities. World Bank’s Social Protection and Labour Strategy 2012-2022. Executive Summary. 68441. Washington DC. World Bank. Available at: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/ WDSP/IB/2012/09/07/000425962_20120907165508/Rendered/PDF/684410WP0ENGLI0trategy0Exec0Summary.pdf. (accesed March, 2015)

Yang, F., Bao, J.M., Huang, X-H., Guo, Q., Smith, G.D. (2015). Measurement of resilience in Chinese older people. Ageing and Aged Care. International Nursing Review, 130-139.

Zaidi, A. (2014). Life Cycle Transitions and Vulnerabilities in Old Age: A Review, UNDP.

Zimmerman, M. (2013). Resiliency Theory: A Strenghts-Based Approach to Research and Practice for Adolescent Health. Health Education and Behaviour, 40(4), 381-383.

Additional Files

Published

20-07-2015