RELIGIOUS IDENTITIES IN LIQUID MODERNITY: POSTISLAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/asas-2021-2-663Keywords:
Postislam, Islam, theology, philosophyAbstract
Postislam has been regarded as a new concept in need of a dire delineation. Basically, a Postislamic tendency is a paradigm of thought (philosophical, scientific, mystical, religious, theological2, etc.) that excessively transcends at least one of the three sources of Islam’s juridical Canons (i.e. Quran, Sunna, Ijma’ or consensus of Scholars). This paper provides a definition for the founding principles of Postislam. It shall examine this concept from a generic point of view. It will equally suggest a constellation of some central problems structuring an emergent system: Postislam. This tendency is positively inherent „in potentiality” (dunamis), in an Aristotelian sense, according to multiple forms of enunciations and semantic variations throughout the history of theology as well as the history of philosophy, theology, Islamic mystique and science. Postislam represents a potentiality devoid of a preexisting concept within Islam; it is an unnamed historical tenant, disseminated throughout a complex combination of theological and mystical first faltering steps.
I will examine some of these instantiations, expressed essentially in Islamic theology (Avicenna’s Metaphysics of Emanation) and mystical tradition (i.e. Sufism in a general acceptance, and the nodal case of Al-Hallâj, in particular). Then, by isolating the essence of Islam’s theological mystique (the structural duality between Sharī’a and Haqīqa, Law and Truth), in order to construct a synthetic deconstruction identified to the concept of Postislam as pure mysticism, or the possibility a of a permanent theophany, indefinitely experienced throughout ecstatic theopathy. We ought to, at this step, enunciate divers axioms based on this concept. As a sequel, I will discuss further philosophical counterpoints and limits to this construction.
References
Abdou M. (1993). Complete Works. Beirut: Dar al-Chourouk.
Adamson, P. (2013). From the necessary existent to God. In Peter Adamson (Ed.).
Interpreting Avicenna. Critical Essays (pp. 170-189.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Al-Hallâj, M. (1913). Kitab al-Tawassîn, translated from Arabic to French and commented by Louis Massignon. Paris: Paul Geuthner.
Al-Qûshayrî, A. al-Q. (2007). Al-risala al-qûshayrîya (Epistle on Sūfism). Garnet Publishig Limited.
Al-Rahim, A.H. (2003). The tewelver-Shi’î reception of Avicenna in the Mongol Period. In Reisman, D.C., Al-Rahim, A.H. (Eds.). Before and after Avicenna: Proceedings of the first Conference of the Avicenna Study Group (pp. 219-232). Leiden: Brill.
Badiou, A. (2003). Saint Paul. The Foundation of Universalism. California: Stanford University Press.
Goldziher, I. (2005). Le dogme et la loi dans l’islam. Histoire du développement dogmatique et juridique de la religion musulmane. Paris: Editions l’éclat et Geuthner.
Ibn ‘Arabī, (2015). The Bezels of Wisdom, trans. Binyamin Abrahamov. New York: Routledge.
Ibn Achour, M.T. (2001). Maqāsid al-Sharī’a al-Islāmiyah (ﺔᘭﻣﻼﺳﻹا ﺔﻌᗫᣄﻟا ﺪﺻﺎﻘﻣ). Amman: Dar Nafa’îs editions.
Jaffer, T. (2003). Bodies, souls and resurrection in Avicenna’s ar-Risàla al- A∂˙awìya fì amr al-ma'àd. In Reisman, D.C., Al-Rahim, A.H. (Eds.). Before and after Avicenna: Proceedings of the first Conference of the Avicenna Study Group (pp. 163-176). Leiden: Brill.
Lapoujade, D. (2014). Deleuze, les mouvements aberrants. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
Laruelle, F. (2013). Dictionary of Non-philosophy. Minneapolis: Univocal, 2013.
Marion, J.-L. (2008). The Visible and the Revealed. New York: Fordham University Press.
Massignon, L. (1975). La Passion de Husayan ibn Mansūr Hallāj, martyr mystique de l’Islam, exécuté à Bagdad le 26 mars 922. Etude d’histoire religieuse, tomes I-IV. Paris, Gallimard.
Massignon, L. (1994). La passion de Hallâj. Paris, Gallimard.
Massignon, L. (1997). Essay on the origins of the technical language of Islamic mystique. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
McGinnis, J. (2003). Avicenna. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rabouin, D. (2012). Un calcul différentiel des idées? Note sur le rapport de Deleuze aux mathématiques. Europe, 996, 140-153.
Rashed, R. (2002). Dieu, la chose et les mathématiques. In Graziella Federici Vesconvini (Ed.). Le problème des transcendantaux du XIVe au XVIIe siècle (pp. 35-50). Paris: Vrin.
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Qu’est-ce qu’un texte? in Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique, II. Paris, Le Seuil.
Soileau, M. (2009). Haqīqa. In Juan E. Campo (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Islam. New York: Facts on File.
