SOME ASPECTS OF POLITICAL POWER: A CONCEPTUAL GUIDE
Cuvinte cheie:
political power, political science, conceptual frameworks, social structures, legitimacyRezumat
The phenomenon of power is very important in explaining political actions. The concept of political power is, in turn, crucial for the study of political life and political ideologies. It was frequently used to define politics, but, in a sense, it is essential to describe the goals of political science. Any practical application will be required to consider a certain understanding of the power relations embedded in social structures. Political power is only one aspect of the power relation in society, but it often expresses itself in subtle, imperceptible forms. That is why, in what follows, we will explore some of the conceptual ramifications of the study of political power, taking into account not only the objective features of the relationship between the „subjects of power” and the „people in power”, but also subjective elements, social and psychological factors, sometimes hardly visible.Referințe
Aron, R. (1967). Les étapes de la pensée sociologique. Paris: Gallimard.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two Faces of Power. American Political Science Review, 56(04), 947–952.
Baudouin, J. (2000). Introduction a la science politique. Paris: Editions Dalloz.
Carpinschi, A., & Bocancea, C. (1998). Știința politicului (Vol. I). Iași: Edutura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași.
Christiano, T. (2013). Authority. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013.). Disponibil la adresa http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ spr2013/entries/authority/
Clark, G. (2014). The Son Also Rises: Surnames and the History of Social Mobility. Princeton University Press.
Clastres, P. (1995). Societatea împotriva statului. Studii de antropologie politică. București: Editura Ararat.
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–215.
Dahl, R. A. (1991). Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Doise, W., Deschamps, J.-C., & Mugny, G. (1999). Psihologie socială experimentală. Iași: Polirom.
Dowding, K. (1998). Puterea. București: Ceu Press & DU Style.
Giddens, A. (2001). Sociologie. București: Editura All.
Hamilton, P. (1991). Max Weber, Critical Assessments. Taylor & Francis.
Lasswell, H., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and Society. A framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lukes, S. (2004). Power: A Radical View (2nd edition.). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire : New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
McLain, I. (2001). Dicţionarul Oxford de Politică. București: Editura Univers Enciclopedic.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371.
Mook, D. (2009). Experimente clasice in psihologie. La inceput a fost experimentul. București: Editura Trei.
O’Brien, M. (2014, October 18). Poor kids who do everything right don’t do better than rich kids who do everything wrong. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/10/18/poor-kids-who-do-everything-right-dont-do-better-than-rich-kids-who-do-everything-wrong/
Weber, M. (1992). Politica , o vocaţie şi o profesie. București: Editura Anima.
Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: a Lesson in the Power of Situation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(30), B6–B7.
