„A vorbi” și „a fi auzit” în comunicarea mediată de calculator
Cuvinte cheie:
voice, listening, audience, social media, computer-mediated communicationRezumat
This paper focuses on the tension between voice and listening in computer-mediated communication. On the one hand, the voice has been taken into consideration on a large scale, being relevant as a form of social capital and also as a condition for social equity. New media have been interpreted as an amplifyer of ordinary voice by the instrumentality of many platforms and tools, and by the inner democratization of speaking. On the other hand, the listening in new media was underexplored. The complexity of this subject is observable in its prerequisites (paying attention and understanding), as well as in the problematic nature of audiences and their engagement.Referințe
AGARWAL, N., LIM, M., & WIGAND, R. (2012). Raising and rising voices in social media. Business & Information Systems Engineering 4 (3): 113-126.
ANDERSON, B. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised edition. London, New York: Verso.
ANG, Ien. 1991. Desperately Seeking the Audience. London: Routledge.
BAYM, Nancy K. 2002. ”Interpersonal Life Online”. In Handboook of New Media, edited by Leah A. Lievrouw & Sonia Livingstone, 62-76. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
BOLER, Megan. 2007. “Hypes, hopes and actualities: new digital Cartesianism and bodies in cyberspace”. New media & Society 9 (1): 139-168.
BURGESS, J. 2006. ”Hearing ordinary voices: Cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling”. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 20 (2): 201-214.
COULDRY, Nick. 2009. ”Rethinking the politics of voice”. Continuum 23 (4): 579-582.
COULDRY, Nick. 2010. Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. Los Angeles, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.
CRAWFORD, Kate. 2009. ”Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media”. Continuum 23 (4): 525-535.
DREHER, Tanja. 2009. ”Listening across difference: Media and multiculturalism beyond the politics of voice”. Continuum 23 (4): 445-458.
GANDY, O. 2002. “The Real Digital Divide: Citizens versus consumers.” In The Handbook of New Media, edited by L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone, 448-460. London: Sage.
GOLDING P., MURDOCK G., CURRAN, J., GUREVITCH, M. 2000. Culture, Communications and Political Economy. Mass Media and Society. Third Edition. London: Arnold.
GUNKEL, David J. 1998. ”Virtually transcendent: Cyberculture and the body”. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (2): 111-123.
HUSBAND, Charles. 2009. ”Between listening and understanding”. Continuum 23 (4): 441-443.
IHDE, Don. 1976. Listening and voice: A phenomenology of sound. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
JENKINS, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York and London: New York University Press.
MACNAMARA, J. 2013. ”Beyond voice: audience-making and the work and architecture of listening as new media literacies”. Continuum 27 (1): 160-175.
MITRA, A., & WATTS, E. 2002. “Theorizing cyberspace: the idea of voice applied to the internet discourse”. New media & society 4(4): 479-498.
MORRIS, M. și OGAN, C. 1996. ”The Internet as mass medium”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 46: 39-50.
O’DONNELL, Penny. 2009. ”Journalism, change and listening practices”. Continuum 23 (4): 503-517.
O’DONNELL, Penny, LLOYD, Justine & DREHER, Tanja. 2009. “Listening, pathbuilding and continuations: A research agenda for the analysis of listening”. Continuum 23 (4): 423-439.
POOL, Ithiel de Sola. 1983. Technologies of Freedom. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.
RHEINGOLD, Howard. 1993. Virtual Communities: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
SOUTHERN, Rosalynd. 2015. ”Is Web 2.0 Providing a Voice for Outsiders? A Comparison of Personal Web Site and Social Media Use by Candidates at the 2010 UK General Election”. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12 (1): 1-17.
WATTS, E.K. 2001. ”Voice and Voicelessness in Rhetorical Studies”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 87(2): 179-196.
