CHARACTERISTICS OF A PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY IN A CLOSED ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENT - THE ARMY. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Ioan MITREA PhD student, ”Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University from Iasi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 54 Lascãr Catargiu street, 700107, Iasi, Romania; phone: +40 756 021 721

Keywords:

organization, closed professional community, career, motivation, military officer

Abstract

This article is part of a primary research aimed to identify the characteristics and differences in the motivational system of military organization employees of Romanian and U.S. army. The study was conducted by applying the questionnaire, with mixed questions, self provided to Romanian and American army officers, on a sample of 104 respondents, of which 74 are Romanian soldiers and 30 American soldiers. The method used is a nonprobability sampling, based on a pre-defined purpose. The research results can not be extended to the whole army. We can see that for both armies, the six social factors, namely: family, personal safety, career, national identifying elements, friends and colleagues, are the primary motivation for Romanian and American troops, the only difference being given by the importance of each category separately. From the perspective of Romanian officers and NCOs, the family and personal safety are very important for both staff with certain features. Romanian Army takes and adapts best practice examples of American and European military, organizational practices such as those of the military system. Continuous adaptation of the military organization to the civil society shows concern for the external operating environment and ensuring the ability of a military unit.

References

Babbie, E. (2010). Practica cercetãrii sociale, traducere de Gherghina, S., Jiglãu G., Andriescu, M., Editura Polirom, Iasi.

Constitution of Romania,

Dâncu, V. (2012). Dupã referendum. Efectele crizei politice asupra încrederii în institutii, profesii si partenerii României, available online at:http://www.ires.com.ro/uploads/articole/interpretare-vasile-d%C3%A2ncu---efectelecrizei-politice.pdf.

Department of Defense, Directive number 5100.01, 21 Decembrie 2010, available online at: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/510001p.pdf.

Dictionarul Explicativ al Limbii Române. (1984). Editura Academie Republicii Socialiste România, Bucuresti.

Druckman, J. N. (2012). The Politics Of Motivation, Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 24:2, 199-216, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2012.711022.

Dutu, P. and Mostoflei, C. (2007). Liderul militar în România, Editura Universitãtii Nationale de Apãrare „Carol I”, Bucuresti.

Floristeanu, E. (2008). Salarizare în armatã. Curs, Editura Academiei Fortelor Terestre „Nicolae Bãlcescu”, Sibiu.

Jelusiè, L.( 2007). Motivation for Peace Operations, International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 17:1, 73-85, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03906700601129632.

Legea nr. 346 din 21.07.2006 privind organizarea si functionarea Ministerului Apãrãrii. Publicatã în Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 654 din 28 iulie 2006.

Legea nr. 80/1995 privind statutul cadrelor militare. Publicatã în Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 155 din 20 iulie 1995.

Taubman–Ben-Ari, O. & Findler, L. (2006). Motivation for Military Service: A Terror Management Perspective, Military Psychology, 18:2, 149-159, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1802_4.

van der Dennen, J.M.G. (2005). Combat Motivation, Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 17:1, 81-89, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14631370500292177.

Additional Files