RELIGIOUS EDUCATION FOR PRISONERS IN ROMANIA

Autori

  • Aurel BAHNARU
  • Remus RUNCAN
  • Patricia RUNCAN

Cuvinte cheie:

Religious education “syllabus”, principles of ethics, prisoners, Romania.

Rezumat

UNO’s Resolution of May 14, 1990 recommends that prisoners have access to education, i.e. to basic education, creative activities, cultural activities, higher education, library facilities, literacy programmes, physical education and sports, religious education/instruction and training (through activities such as Bible studies, church attendance, holy day observances, religious counselling, religious/theological education classes, retreats, scriptural study groups, worship and prayer services, etc. carried out by chaplains, ministers, or religious volunteers), social education, and vocational training. Religious practice, no matter the form, can help prisoners adapt/adjust (i.e. coping or avoiding trouble) to prison life, lowers recidivism rates and ensures post-release success (prisoner re-entry or social reinsertion) – given that religion can change cognitive approaches to conflict, emphasize accountability and responsibility, provide social support and social skills through interaction with religious people and communities, and target antisocial values. In this context, religious education/guidance/teaching is, together with cultural activities, discussion groups, leisure activities, literacy classes, and sports activities, part of any social rehabilitation plan. Based on field work experience – counselling prisoners (both teenagers and adults) in Romanian penitentiaries – the authors propose a religious education “syllabus” based on the principles of ethics: the principle of respect for autonomy or of human dignity (respecting the decisions made by other people concerning their own lives), the principle of beneficence (bringing about good in all our actions), the principle of non-maleficence (not harming others), and the principle of justice (providing others with whatever they are owed or deserve).

Biografii autori

Aurel BAHNARU

PhD from the West University, 4, Vasile Parvan Blvd., Timisoara

Remus RUNCAN

Postdoctoral Researcher, West University, 4, Vasile Parvan Blvd., Timisoara,

Patricia RUNCAN

Associate Professor, Department of Social Work, Faculty of Psichology and Sociology, West University, 4, Vasile Parvan Blvd., Timisoara

Referințe

Becci, I. (2011). Religion’s Multiple Locations in Prisons: Germany, Italy and Switzerland. Archives de sciences sociales des religions, 153, pp. 1-15.

Brown, R. R. (2013). Un-barring Hope: Theological Education and the Prison. Religious Education Association Annual Meeting, Nov 8-10, Boston, MA. pp. 1-8.

Buck Willison, J., Brazzell, D. & Kim, K. (2007). Faith-Based Corrections and Reentry Programs. Advancing a Conceptual Framework for Research and Evaluation. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Clear, T. R., Stout, B. D., Dammer, H. R., Kelly, L., Hardyman, P. L. & Shapiro, C. (1992). Does Involvement in Religion Help Prisoners Adjust to Prison? FOCUS, November 1992. San Francisco, CA: The National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

Clear, T. R., Hardyman, P. L., Stout, B., Lucken, K. & Dammer, H. R. (2000). The Value of Religion in Prison. An Inmate Perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16 (1), pp. 53-74.

Common Code of Ethics for Chaplains, Pastoral Counsellors, Pastoral Educators and Students. (2004). Available at: http://ethics.iit.edu/ecodes/node/3710. Accessed on June 19, 2018.

Dawe, S. (Ed.). (2007). Vocational education and training for adult prisoners and offenders in Australia. Research Readings. Adelaide: NCVR.

Dragomir, C. (2014). Persons Deprived of Freedom: from Condemnation to the Socio-Professional Reintegration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 149, pp. 292-296.

Francis, T. N. (2010). The Effect of Education Programs on Prisoner Recidivism in Michigan. MA Thesis. Marquette, MI: Northern Michigan University.

Gracyk, T. (2016). Four fundamental ethical principles. Available at: http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/phil%20115/Four_Basic_principles.htm. Accessed on June 19, 2018.

Halstead, J. M. & Taylor, M. J. (Eds.). (1996). Values in Education and Education in Values. Bristil, PA: Palmer Press, Taylor & Francis, Inc.

Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.®.

Ilechukwu, L. C. & Ugwuozor, O. (2017). Utilization of Religious and Philosophy Education in Uplifting the Image of Prison Inmates and Curtailing Ex-prisoners’ Recidivism in Enugu Prison Yard in Nigeria. London: SAGE Open. pp. 1-15.

Iosim, I. (2019). Comunicare. Timisoara: Editura Stampa.

Johnson, B. R., Larson, D. B. & Pitts, T. C. (1997). Religious Programs, Institutional Adjustment, and Recidivism among Former Inmates in Prison Fellowship Programs. Justice Quarterly 14(1), pp. 1-20.

Johnson, B. R. (2004). Religious Programs and Recidivism among Former Inmates in Prison Fellowship Programs: A Long-term Follow-up Study. Justice Quarterly 21(2), pp. 329-354.

Johnson, B. R. (2012). Can a Faith-Based Prison Reduce Recidivism? Corrections Today. pp. 60-62.

Loucks, N. (2000). Prison Rules: A Working Guide. London: Prison Reform Trust.

Lugo, L., Cooperman, A., Bodie, S. C., Funk, C. & O’Connell, E. (2012). Religion in Prisons. A 50-State Survey of Prison Chaplains. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Montgomery, M. J. & Turner, R. G. (2013). Gender, Religion, and Prison Adjustment of Offenders. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(4), pp. 149-157.

Mulcahy, E., Merrington, S. & Bell, P. (2013). The Radicalisation of Prison Inmates: Exploring Recruitment, Religion and Prisoner Vulnerability. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10072/64669. Retrieved on July 3, 2018.

O’Connor, T. P., Brooks, T. L. & Sprauer, M. W. (1999). Spirituality, Religion and What Works Religious Outcomes This Side of Heaven. Proceedings of the American Correctional Association Annual Conference, Lanham, MD.

Phillips, C. (2007). Ethnicity, Identity and Community Cohesion in Prison. In M. Wetherell, M. Lafleche & R. Berkeley (Eds.), Identity, ethnic diversity and community cohesion. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 75-86.

Randall, G. K. & Bishop, A. J. (2012). Direct and Indirect Effects of Religiosity on Valuation of Life through Forgiveness and Social Provisions among Older Incarcerated Males. The Gerontologist, 53 (1), pp. 51-59.

Rostaing, C., Béraud, C. & de Galembert, C. (2015). Religion, Reintegration and Rehabilitation in French Prisons: The Impact of Prison Secularism. In I. Becci & O. Roy (Eds.), Religious Diversity in European Prisons. Basel: Springer International Publishing AG.

Sessomes, D. A. (2014). From Violation to Revelation: Finding Faith in the Depths of Prison Hell. PhD Dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.

SpearIt. (2012). Religion as Rehabilitation? Reflections on Islam in the Correctional Setting. Whittier Law Review, 34, pp. 763-787.

SpearIt. (2016). The Return of the Pell Grants for Prisoners? Criminal Justice, pp. 10-13.

Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners Adopted by the First United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, held at Geneva in 1955, and approved by the Economic and Social Council by its resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977.

Thirumalai, D. (2004). Religion and Crime: A Study of Inmates in State and Federal Prisons in the United States. MA Thesis. Johnson City, TN: East Tennessee State University.

U.N.O. & U.N.E.S.C.O. (1995). Basic Education in Prisons. Maryland, MD: Maryland State Department of Education.

Váně, J. & Dirga, L. (2016). The Religiosity Behind Bars: Forms of Inmate's Religiosity in the Czech Prison System. Sociológia 48(6), pp. 641-663.

Wambugu, P. M. (2014). Chaplaincy and Rehabilitating Prisoners: A Case Study of Embu and Kamiti Prisons in Kenya. MA Thesis. Nairobi: Kenyatta University.

Fișiere adiționale

Publicat

2019-12-20