THE PHENOMENON OF POVERTY AND THE THEORIES OF STRATIFICATION AND OF SOCIAL MOBILITY

Nina Mihaela MIHALACHE

Autori

Nina Mihaela MIHALACHE PhDs.university lecturer Department of Sociology and Social Work University Al.I.Cuza, Iasi

Cuvinte cheie:

social stratification, social class, social status, social mobility

Rezumat

According to the social stratification systems, the words social status, social class and social mobility, although they have in common the position that an individual has in community and in society, as well, there are some significant differences. The social status referred to the differentiation of individual inequality through legal regulations, while in case of class system these regulations are not precisely defined. An individual may acquire a certain social class and this thing depends on the economical component of his life. This component influences the lifestyle of the people differentiated according to social classes, offering them a certain social status and also a certain social position. Social mobility has an organic nature because it can evolve according to individual aspirations and functions. It is closely related to personal responsibility for economical development and growth. Individuals will establish their further aspirations according to the background performances determining a defence mechanism to protect self-esteem. Thus, the lower the past performances, the lower the aspirations and self-esteem. Analyses show that poverty and its duration is proportional to individual aspirations.

Referințe

Bradshow, J. 1972. The Concept of Social Need, New Society. Martie, 640-643.

Duby,G. 1978. Les Trois Ordres on l'Imaginaire du Feodalisme. Gallimard, Paris.

Ferreol,G. (ed.), Cauche, Ph., Duprez, J.-M., Gadrey, N., Simon, M. 1998. Dictionar de Sociologie. Polirom, Iasi.

Giddens, A. 2001. Stratificare si structura de clasa. In Sociologie. Bic All, Bucuresti, 263-310.

Gordon, D., Spiker, P. (eds.). 1999. The International Glossary on Poverty. ISPR, Books-Cape Town, The University Press-Dhaka, White Lotus Bangkok, Zed Books- London, New York .

Morton D. 1968. Field Theory. In Sills D. (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Social Science. Macmillan Company and Free Press.

Poede, G. 2008. Perspective istorice asupra programelor si politicilor sociale. In Politici sociale. Course ID, Editura Universitatii”Al.I.Cuza”, Iasi, 47.

Maria Estela Ortega Rubi. 1999. Duality in Social Representation of Poverty, in Neculau, A., Ferreol, G. (eds.). Aspecte psihosociale ale saraciei, Editura Polirom. Iasi. 178-193.

Mihalache, N. 2006. "Teorii ale saraciei si saracirii populatiei". în Revista de cercetare si interventie sociala. vol 12. Holt România si Universitatea „Al.I.Cuza”. Departamentul de Sociologie si Asistenta Sociala. Ed.Lumen. Iasi. 2006. 73-74.

Mihalache, N. 2008. "Theories of Poverty and of Population's Impoverishment". in Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii „Al.I.Cuza” din Iasi, serie noua, Sociologie si Asistenta Sociala. TOM I. Editura Universitatii „Al.I.Cuza”. Iasi. 156-160.

Ungureanu, I. 1990. "Structuri Sociale: Clase, stratificare si mobilitate sociala". In Paradigme ale cunoasterii societatii. Humanitas, Bucuresti, 133-144.

Voicu, B. 2004. Revista Calitatea Vietii. Editura Academiei Române XV, Bucuresti, 1-2, 137-157.

Voicu, M., Zamfir C. (eds). 1998. Dictionar de saracie. Institutul de Cercetare a Calitatii Vietii, Disponibil online la http://www.iccv.ro/index.php/en/dictionary-poverty, accesat nov. 2009.

Voicu, B. 1999. "Modernitatea între traditie si postmodernism". în Revista de Cercetari Sociale, nr. 3-4. Bucuresti.

Zender A., Medow H. 1963. "Individual and Group Level of Aspiration". In Human Relation, 16, 89-105.

Weber, M. 1971. Economie et societe. Plon, Paris, 309.