PENITENTIARY SOCIAL WORK FROM AN AGENTIC PERSPECTIVE

Auteurs

  • Sorina POLEDNA

Mots-clés :

prison, social work, agency, rehabilitation, accountability

Résumé

Starting from the characteristics of the prison and the implications of the restriction of liberty, the role of social work and the specific profile of the social worker in the penitentiary is discussed regarding the „passing ritual” of the prisoner from the experience of detention to community life. For this purpose, his accountability becomes an important dimension around which convergent efforts can be matched to his/her rehabilitation and social reintegration. The accountability of the persons deprived of their liberty is seen not as an end in itself, but as a multi-level construction, in different areas of society, aiming at multiple and complementary ends. These steps to accountability, we analyse them from an agentic perspective, from the concept of agency, a construct that implies a set of qualities that contribute to the personal competence and the force of an autonomously engaged person, in a deep and long-term pro-social change.

Biographie de l'auteur

Sorina POLEDNA

Assoc.Prof.,Social Work Department, Babes-Bolyai University, M. Kogălniceanu str., No 4, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Références

I. 1. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy.In Ramachaudran.,R.,S.(ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior,4. New York: Academic Press.

II. 2. Best., D., W., Lubman .D., I. (2012). The recovery paradigm. A model of hope and change for alcohol and drug addiction Volume 41, No.8, August 2012 p 593-597.

III. 3. Casey,S., Day.,A, Ward, T. (2013). Fundations of offender rehabilitation, Routledge, London, NewYork, p37.

IV. 4. Foucault, M. (1997). A supraveghea ?i a pedepsi. Nasterea inchisorii. Bucuresti: Humanitas, pp. 344, 349, 360.

V. 5. Goffman, E. (2004). Aziluri. Eseuri despre situatia sociala a pacientilor psihiatrici si a altor categorii de persoane institutionalizate. Iasi: Polirom, pp.16-17, p 23.

VI. 6. Healy., D. (2013). Changing Fate? Agency and the desistance process.in Theoretical Criminology 17 (4), 557-574.

VII. 7. Krogsrud,K.,O’Melia, M., DuBois, B. (2006): Practica Asistenţei Sociale, Iaşi, Polirom, pp. 29-31.

VIII. 8. Pincus, A., Minahan, A. (1973). Social work practice.Model and method,Itasca, IL: Peacock, pp. 54-74.

IX. 9. Poledna, S., Grosu D. (2017). Asisten?a socială a migran?ilor.Centrul de consiliere pentru persoane din estul Europei al Diakonie Hamburg, in Revista de Asistenta Sociala, anul XVI, 2/2017, www.swreview.ro, p.136.

X. 10. Sapouna, M., Bisset, C., Conlong, AM., Matthews., B. (2015). What Works to Reduce Reoffending: A Summary of the Evidence. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. p. 7.

XI. 11. Toch., H. (1977). Living in prison:The ecology of survival.NewYork, Free Press.

Fichiers supplémentaires

Publiée

2019-12-20