INTERSECTING VULNERABILITIES: BUCHAREST HOUSING AT THE NEXUS OF SEISMIC EXPOSURE, SOCIAL PRECARITY AND CULTURAL PERCEPTION OF RISK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/asas-2025-1-810Keywords:
vulnerable city, structural vulnerability, seismic risk, social precarity, housing, risk perception, collective memory, community resilienceAbstract
The topic of earthquakes is not just about buildings; it also concerns the people who live in them. When we refer to earthquakes, we are not merely referring to buildings – we are talking about the people who live in them. Earthquakes do not affect everyone equally, even when we inhabit equally unsafe structures. In today’s urban context, seismic risk cannot be reduced to technical aspects, just as vulnerability can no longer be understood solely as exposure to natural hazards. Seismic risk involves the interaction of structural, political, social, economic, and cultural factors. This article focuses on Bucharest – the European capital with the highest seismic risk (Armaș et al., 2017; Crowley et al., 2021) – marked by a long seismic history and fragile residential infrastructure. Based on qualitative research, including 32 in-depth interviews conducted between March 2022 and September 2024 with tenants and owners of high-risk buildings in Bucharest, each lasting between 1h30m and 3h, this study highlights how structural and social vulnerabilities intersect and amplify one another. It further explores symbolic representations and myths embedded in the collective memory of past seismic events. The paper reconceptualizes housing as a space of internalized danger and addresses seismic risk not as an isolated threat, but as a socially and culturally embedded reality. It concludes by underlining the need for an interdisciplinary mapping of vulnerabilities and urban policies centred on community resilience and local perceptions of risk.
References
Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Armaș, I. (2006). Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 26(5), 1223-1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00810.x
Armaș, I. (2012). Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of Bucharest, Romania. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 1129–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0209-2
Armaș, I., Toma-Dănilă, D., & Ionescu, G. A. (2017a). Vulnerability to Earthquake Hazard: Bucharest Case Study, Romania. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 8 (2), 182-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-017-0132-y
Armas, Iuliana & Cretu, Romeo & Ionescu, Radu. (2017b). Self-efficacy, stress, and locus of control: The psychology of earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 71-76. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.018.
Beck, U. (2009). World risk society. Polity Press.
Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. Institute for Environment and Human Security Journal, 5, 7-54.
Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, 1(9), 3-7.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At Risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714775
Borden, K. A., Schmidtlein, M. C., Emrich, C. T., Piegorsch, W. W., & Cutter, S. L. (2007). Vulnerability of U.S. cities to environmental hazards. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1279
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, G. F. (1978). The environment as hazard. Guilford Press.
Calotescu, I., Pavel, F., Văcăreanu, R. (2018). Earthquake Risk Awareness in Bucharest, Romania: Public Survey. 10.1007/978-3-319-74724-8_20.
Cannon, T. (1994). Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of “natural” disasters. In A. Varley (Ed.), Disasters, development and environment (pp. 13–30). John Wiley and Sons.
Collier, S. J., & Lakoff, A. (2008). Distributed preparedness: The spatial logic of domestic security in the United States. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1068/d446t
Crowley, H., Dabbeek, J., Despotaki, V., Rodrigues, D., Martins, L., Silva, V., Romão, X., Pereira, N., Weatherill, G., & Danciu, L. (2021). European Seismic Risk Model (ESRM20). EFEHR Technical Report 002, V1.0.0. https://doi.org/10.7414/EUC-EFEHR-TR002-ESRM20
Cutter, S. L. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000407 (Original work published 1996)
Cutter, S. L. (2003). The Vulnerability of Science and the Science of Vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.93101
Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press.
Donovan, A. (2016). Geopower: Reflections on the critical geography of disasters. Progress in Human Geography, 41(1), 44-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515627020
Dwyer, A., Zoppou, C., Nielsen, O., Day, S., & Roberts, S. (2004). Quantifying social vulnerability: a methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards (Vol. 14). Canberra: Geoscience Australia.
Flanagan, B. E., Gregory, E. W., Hallisey, E. J., Heitgerd, J. L., & Lewis, B. (2011). A social vulnerability index for disaster management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1792
Gaillard, J. C., & Mercer, J. (2013). From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512446717
Granger, K. (2000). An Information Infrastructure for Disaster Management in Pacific Island Countries. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 15(1), 20-32. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.368242818188972
Jupp, V. (2010). Dicționar al metodelor de cercetare socială (trad. S. Mereu). Polirom.
Moldovan, I. (2018). The country where 96% of homes are privately owned. BBC Worklife. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/gallery/20181119-the-country-where-96-of-citizens-own-homes
Pavel, F., Vacareanu, R., Arion, C., Aldea, A., Scupin, A. (2021). Seismic risk assessment of lifelines in Bucharest. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 66, 102629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102629
Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917057
Popescu, R. (2017). ALERT – Analiza de vulnerabilitate: Consideraţii privind situația socio-demografică a Bucureștiului, din perspectiva teritorială, în fața unui cutremur de intensitate ridicată. Proiect ALERT.
Rotariu, T., & Iluț, P. (2006). Ancheta sociologică și sondajul de opinie. Teorie și practică (2nd ed.). Polirom.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp 117-152). Praege.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The Affect Heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.025
Toma-Danila, Dragos. (2018). A GIS framework for evaluating the implications of urban road network failure due to earthquakes: Bucharest (Romania) case study. Natural Hazards, 93, 97-111. 10.1007/s11069-017-3069-y.
Văcăreanu, R., Pavel, F., Arion, C., & Scupin, A. (2019). Enhancing resilience: Seismic risk in Romania – assessment and premises for reduction. DRMKC 4th Annual Scientific Seminar – Acting Today, Protecting Tomorrow.
Wisner, B. (2004). Assessment of capability and vulnerability. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people (pp. 183-193). Earthscan.
