ANALITICAL STUDY REGARDING THE SOVEREIGNTY’s PARADIGM IN THE EUROPEAN SPACE

ANDREA-RÉKA NAGY

Abstract


The concept of sovereignty has raised intense academic debates for more than a century. The notion in itself was and is under ongoing change, evolving at the same time with the political and historical circumstances. The present work is focused on searching for an answer to the question to what degree the post-modern multi-dimensional sovereignty affects the national classical sovereignty, known also as westphalian. Moreover, it will be analyze whether the European regionalization or integration represents a limit with regard to the state sovereignty or it insures its existence itself. The hypothesis from which it is started is that it was produced an expansion, a recalibration of the semantic sphere of the concept of sovereignty, the notion not being able to be understood in a classical form because, in the globalization context, the defense of the national territory depends upon the optimal cooperation. The efficient cooperation insures the regional security, and the growing tensions in the EU lead to the increase of insecurity and, implicitly, to the increase of the national insecurity. The national sovereignty depends on the regional structure of which it is part of.

Keywords


Sovereignty, nation-state, limited sovereignty, security, European Union

References


Ambrosă, A.M. (2014). Doctrinele politicii internaționale în Războiul Rece. Revista Polis,Vol. IV, 4(6).

Anghel, I.M. (2010). Suveranitatea statelor membre ale Uniunii Europene. Analele Universității Constantin Brâncuşi din Târgu Jiu, Seria Științe Juridice, (2), 19-48.

Antonescu, M.V. (2009). Instituțiile Uniunii Europene în perioada post Nisa. Iași: Editura Lumea.

Baudet, T. H.P. (2012). The Significance of Borders: Why Representative Government and The Rule of Law Require Nation States. Leiden: Leiden University Press.

Ben, H. (2011). The Nation-Sate: Durability Through Change. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 24, 72.

Biersteker, T.J. & Weber, C. (1996). State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chaturvedi, I. Globalization and Its Impact on State Sovereignty. retrived from http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_249.pdf

Davis, B. G. (1907). The Geneva Convention of 1906. The American Journal of International Law. 409-417.

Evans, P.B. (1997). The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Statenes in an Era of Globalization. World Politics 50, 62-87.

Fukuyama, F. (2005). Construcția statelor. Ordinea mondială în secolul XXI. București: Editura Antet XX Press.

Garner, J. W. (1928). Political Science and Government. New York: American Book Company.

Goldstein, L.F. (2011). Consulting Federal Sovereignty. The EuropeanUnuion in Comparative Context, Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 2011.

Grecu, S.P. (2012). Modele de analiză în consolidarea democratică. Perspective comparate în Europa Centrală şi de Est. Iaşi: Editura Universităţii "Al.I.Cuza".

Grecu, S.P. (2015). Democraţie şi securitate umană în statele est-europene. Perspective comparate. In Răducu, C.D. & Ştefanachi, B. (Eds.). Securitate umană. pp.129-151, Bucureşti: Editura Pro Universitaria.

Grecu, S.P. (2016). Models of political behavior: political attitudes and national identity. In Mironescu, A. & Bibiri, A.D. (Eds.). Figures of Migration. Iaşi: Editura Universităţii "Al.I.Cuza".

Green, A. (1997). Education, Globalization and the Nation State. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Grinin, L.E. (2012). New Foundations of International System Or Why do States Lose Their Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization? Journal of Globalization Studies, 3, (1), 3-38.

Held, D. (1995). Political Theory of Modern State. Cambridge: Polity Press in association Blackwill Publishers Limited.

Held, D. (2002). Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty. Legal Theory. 8 (2), 48-49.

Heywood, A. (2004). Political Theory.New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.

Hlihor, C. (2010). Sfârșitul statului-națiune și al identității naționale sau criză de soluții?. Analele Universității Creștine Dimitrie Cantemir. Seria Istorie – Serie nouă (2), 132-142.

Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe, Daedalus, Tradition and Change 95, (3), pp. 862-915.

Judt, T. (2005). Après-guerre: une histoire de l'Europe depuis 1945. Paris: Éditions Hachette Grand Pluriel.

Kapur, A. C. (1950). Principles of Political Science. New Delhi: S. Chand Publishing.

Kelleh, F. (2012). The Changing Paradigm of State Sovereignty in The Tnternational System. University of Missouri-Kansas City:Kensans City. Retrived from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/14672/KellehChaParSta.pdf;sequence=1

Kissinger, H. (2014). Ordinea mondială. Reflecții asupra specificului națiunilor și a cursului istoriei, București: Editura Rao.

Krasner, D. S. (2001). Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.

Krasner, S. (1988). Sovereignity: An Institutional Perspective. Comparative Political Studies. (21), 66-94.

Malcom, N. (1991). Sens on Sovereignty. London: Davlyn Design and Print.

Mattli, W. (1999). Logic of Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Miga-Beşteliu, R. (2003). Drept internațional: introducere în dreptul internațional public. București: Editura ALL, 2003.

Murden, S. (2001). Culture in the world affairs. In Baylis, J. & Smith, S. (Eds.). The Globalization of World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations. Second Edition, New York: Oxford University Press.

Oppenheim, L. (1928). International law. A treatise. 4-th Edition by A.D. McNair, London: Longmans.

Smith, A. (2007). Nation in decline? The Erosion and persistence of modern national identities. In Young, M & Zuelow, E. & Strum, A. (Eds.). Nationalism in a Global Era. London: Routledge.

Steinberger, H. (2000). Sovereignty. In Bernhardt, R.(ed.). Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Volume Four, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Şandru, D. M. (2012). Dreptul Uniunii Europene. Jurisprudență și Legislație. București: Editura Universitară.

Vrabie, G. (2002). Integrare europeană și suveranitatea de stat. Retrived https://www.ccr.ro/uploads/Publicatii%20si%20statistici/Buletin%202002/VRABIE.pdf

Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.

Group of Experts on the United Nations Programme in Public Administration and Finance. (2000). Globalization and State: an overview. Report prepared by the Secretariat, 2-4, https://publicadministration.un.org/publications/content/PDFs/E-Library%20Archives/World%20Public%20Sector%20Report%20series/World%20Public%20Sector%20Report.2001.pdf

Fondation Robert Schuman. European Union, globalisation, sovereignty. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/0410-europe-and-sovereignty-reality-limits-and-outlook

Fondation Robert Schuman. Globalisation, sovereignty, European Union. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/0410-europe-and-sovereignty-reality-limits-and-outlook

Fondation Robert Schuman. National sovereignty, European Unuion. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/0410-europe-and-sovereignty-reality-limits-and-outlook


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.