Discourse and Cognition in Political Psychology. How Political Language Could Shape Emotions and Beliefs?

Silviu-Petru GRECU

Abstract


The aim of this article is to underlie the role played by the political discourse in creating social and political beliefs, emotions and attitudes. However, at the theoretical level we can observe the role played by the emotional structure in generating “hot cognition”. Thus, the relation between political cognition and emotional stimuli was described in the field of the cognitive neurosciences through fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging). Moreover, researchers have observed a strong relationship between the limbic system and political stimuli. Also, in the field of the cognitive sciences we have to stress the role played by the “mental contexts” in shaping social and political cognition. Thus, the main catalyst for generating mental contexts is represented by the political language/ political discourse. This article realizes the qualitative analysis of the discourse sustained at Mansion House by the Prime- Minister Theresa May. The theme of the discourse regards the future of UK after Brexit. Also, the discourse presents the economic and social challenges for the future of the UK. In correlation with the theoretical framework, we tested if this kind of discourse generates rational beliefs or emotions. Empirical findings demonstrate the equilibrium between rational beliefs and emotional stimuli. If we refer to the emotional sphere we have to underline the presence of the words which generate emotions as: patriotic feeling (national pride), freedom, independence and need for security and protection.

Keywords


political cognition, Brexit, “mental context”, Theresa May, political discourse

Full Text:

Full Text: PDF

References


ADOLPHS, Ralph. 2003. “Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Social Behavior”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4: 165-178.

ALFORD, John, Carolyn FUNK, and John HIBBING. 2005. “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?”. American Political Science Review 99 (2): 153-167.

AMODIO, David, John JOST, Sarah MASTER, and Cindy YEE. 2007. “Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism.” Nature Neuroscience 10, (10): 1246-1247.

ARCURI, Luciano, Luigi CASTELLI, and Silvia GALDI. 2008. “Predicting the Vote: Implicit Attitudes as Predictors of the Future Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters”. Political Psychology 29 (3): 369-387.

BANDURA, Albert. 1977. Social Learning Theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

BOTVINICK, Matthew, Jonathan D. COHEN, and Cameron S. CARTER. 2004. “Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (12): 539-546.

CAÑETE, Lucio, HernánDIAZ, FelisaCÓRDOVA, Tania SOTO, Eduardo REINAO, and FrediPALOMINOS. 2015. “How to Measure Rhetorical Impact of Teaching and their Levels of Persuasion: A Neuro-rhetoric Approach”. Annals of Data Science 2 (4): 403-441.

CHIRIAC, Horia-Costin. 2016. “The Idea of Argument in the Political Discourse. A Selective Overview”. Argumentum. Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric 14 (1): 84-101.

CHIRIAC, Horia-Costin. 2017. “The Vicinity Paradigm in Information Society”. Argumentum. Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric 15 (2): 63-83.

DIETRICH, Arne and Michel AUDIFFREN. 2011. “The reticular-activating hypofrontality (RAH) model of acute exercise”. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35: 1305–1325.

DUNBAR, Robin. 2011. “The Social Brain Hypothesis and its Relevance to Social Psychology”. In Evolution and the social mind, Evolutionary Psychology and Social Cognition, edited by J. P. Forgas, M. G. Haselton and W. von Hippel, 21-33. New York: Psychology Press.

ELSTER, John.2013. Comportamentul social.Fundamentele explicaţiei în ştiinţele sociale. Bucureşti: Editura ALL.

FODOR, Jerry, and Zenon W. PYLYSHYN. 1988. “Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis”. Cognition 28 (1-2): 3-71.

FOWLER, James and Darren SCHREIBER. 2008. “Biology, politics and the emerging science of human nature”. Science 322: 912-913.

HATEMI, Peter, Sarah E. MEDLAND, Robert KLEMMENSEN, Sven OSKARSSON, Levente LITTVAY, Christopher T. DAWES, Brad VERHULST, Rose MCDERMOTT, Asbjørn SONNE NØRGAARD, Casey A. KLOFSTAD, Kaare CHRISTENSEN, Magnus JOHANNESSON, Patrik K. E. MAGNUSSON, Lindon J. EAVES, and Nicholas G. MARTIN. 2014. “Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations”. Behavioral Genetics 44 (3): 282-294.

HATEMI, Peter, Carolyn L. FUNK, Sarah E. MEDLAND, Hermine M. MAES, Judy L. SILBERG, Nicholas G. MARTIN, and Lindon J. EAVES. 2009. “Genetic and Environmental Transmission of Political Attitudes over a Life Time”. The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1141–1156.

JOST, John, Hannah NAM, David M. AMODIO, and Jay J. VAN BAVEL. 2014. “Political Neuroscience: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship”. Advances in Political Psychology 35: 3-42.

KANAI, Ryota, Tom FEILDEN, Colin FIRTH, and Geraint Rees. 2011. “Political Orientation are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults”. Current Biology 21 (8): 677-680.

KANDEL, Eric, James H. SCHWARTZ, and Thomas M. JESSELL.2000. Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.

LIEBERMAN, Matthew, Darren SCHREIBER, and Kevin N. OCHSNER. 2003. “Is Political Cognition Like Riding a Bicycle? How Cognitive Neuroscience Can Inform Research on Political Thinking”. Political Psychology 24 (4): 681-704.

MICLEA, Mircea. 2003. Psihologie cognitivă, Modele teoretico-experimentale. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.

MOSKOWITZ, Gordon. 2001. Cognitive Social Psychology : The Princeton Symposium On the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition. Princeton: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

NEISSER, Ulric Gustav. 1967. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

NEWEN, Albert. 2015. “What are cognitive processes? An example-based approach. Synthese 194 (11): 4251-4268.

ROWDEN, Jessica, David LLOYD, and Nigel GILBERT. 2014. “A Model of Political Voting Behaviours across Different Countries”. Physica A 413: 609-625.

SPIRKIN, Alexander.1965. El Origen de la concienciahumana. Buenos Aires: Platina/Sitilcograf.

VAN DIJK, Teun. 2001. “Discourse, Ideology and Context”. Folia Linguistica XXXV (1-2): 11-40.

VAN DIJK, Teun. 2006 a. “Discourse, context and cognition”. Discourse Studies 8 (1): 159–177.

VAN DIJK, Teun. 2006 b. “Politics, Ideology, and Discourse”. In Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition, section on Language and Politics, edited by R.Wodak, 728-740. Oxford: Elsevier.

WESTEN, Drew, PavelBLAGOV, Keith HARENSKI, Clint KILTS, and Stephan HAMANN. 2006. “Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Emotional Constraints on Partisan Political Judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (11): 1947-1958.

ZLATE, Mielu. 2006. Psihologia mecanismelor cognitive. Iaşi: EdituraPolirom.

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/theresa-may-mansion-house-speech-england-london-mansion-news-footage/929030510

https://www.civilservant.org.uk/library/2018-03-02-PM's_Brexit_Speech.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.