Revisiting Securitization Theory in a Fragmented World: The Shifting Landscape of Security and Threat Construction
Cuvinte cheie:
Security imaginary, security threats, securitization theory, security cultureRezumat
This theoretical paper explores the expansion of the security concept beyond traditional military strength. Technological advancements, societal transformations, environmental challenges, and strategic communication have significantly shaped perceptions and constructions of threats in discourse. The study analyzes securitization (Buzan, Weaver & de Wilde, 1998; Balzacq, 2005; Xu & Shi, 2025) as a concept influenced by these factors. It introduces the notion of a ‘security imaginary’, defined as a collection of narratives, symbols, and communicative discourses (Mokry, 2023) that characterize the contemporary international environment, and initiates a discussion on the reconfiguration of current understandings of securitization. The analysis demonstrates how this imaginary has evolved across four interconnected domains. First, societal vulnerabilities arising from populist politics, polarization, and deception have rendered trust and shared belonging essential security assets. Second, the proliferation of cyberspace, technology, and artificial intelligence has redefined deterrence, knowledge, and surveillance in a data-driven context. Third, cultural processes increasingly commercialize fear, transforming danger into a form of “threat theatre” for audiences. Finally, the scope of security has expanded both globally and temporally due to the impact of climate change.
Recent developments in the international arena indicate a convergence between traditional and contemporary security discourses. Current conceptualizations of threats integrate earlier emphases on defense, sovereignty, and resilience with a modern, shared language of threat. This transformation is driven not only by coercion, force, and power but also by words, symbols, and meaning. As a result, security now encompasses both defense and the construction of meaning, leading to significant implications.
Acknowledgement: This research was supported by the project “EU and Romania’s Contribution to Civil Security in Moldova: Policies, Strategic Partnerships, and Strengthening European Identity (SECURE-MD)”, project code PN-IV-PCB-RO-MD-2024-0237, financed by the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI).
Referințe
Anghel, V. (2025). The Illusion of Containment: Why Removing Extremist Candidates Will Not Halt the Far-Right in Romania. IAI Commentaries. Retrieved from https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/c05/illusion-containment
Antoniades, A., Miskimmon, A., &O’Loughlin, B. (2010). Great power politics and strategic narratives. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00435.x
Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46(5), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers
Council of the European Union (2023). How the EU Combats Harmful Content Online. Policy page. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/how-the-eu-combats-harmful-content-online/
Detges, A., Foong, A. (2023). Context matters. A review of the evidence of how social, economic, and other variables influence the relationship between climate and security. Adelphi Research GmbH. Retrieved from https://weatheringrisk.org/en/publication/context-matters.
Ernst, M. (2025). Democratic legitimacy under threat: The Romanian presidential election crisis of 2024. Romania-Insider.com. Retrieved from https://www.romania-insider.com/ires-survey-scrapping-elections-jan-2025?utm_source=chatgpt.com
European Commission & High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2018). Action Plan Against Disinformation. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council, JOIN (2018) 36 final, 5 December 2018.https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2018-12/eu-communication-disinformation-euco-05122018_en.pdf
European Commission (2018). Tackling Online Disinformation: A European Approach. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2018) 236 final, 26 April 2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0236
European Commission (2022). A Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation. Brussels: European Commission. Policy document available via the EU Digital Strategy portal.https://commission.europa.eu/topics/countering-information-manipulation/strengthened-eu-code-practice-disinformation_en
European Commission (2025). Commission Staff Working Document – Republic of Moldova 2025 Report. SWD (2025) 758 final, Brussels, 4 November 2025.https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/23fa6af0-89b3-4532-a3d9-d1638727d14c_en?filename=moldova-report-2025.pdf
European External Action Service (EEAS). (2024). https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/information-integrity-and-countering-foreign-information-manipulation-interference-fimi_en
Funieru, F. (2011). Society and Security [Societate şi Securitate].Revista Română de Sociologie, XXII (1–2), 170–184.
Futter, A., & Zala, B. (2024). The return of nuclear great power politics: Or why we stopped worrying about terrorists and the bomb. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae059
Heide, M., & Villeneuve, J.-P. (2021). Framing national security secrecy: A conceptual review. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 76(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020211016475 (Original work published 2021)
Hellman, M. (2024). Disinformation as a security problem: Re-thinking resilience and sovereignty.Journal of Information Warfare, 23(1), 5–22
Hobbes, T. (2023). Leviatanul. Materia, forma și puterea unei comunitati eclesiastice si civile. (Operă original publicatăîn 1651). Editura Herald.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354066105052960
Kaldor, M. (2007). Human security: Reflections on globalization and intervention. Polity Press. (214-215)
Kivimaa, P. (2023). Climate security connects fragile and strong states via cascading effects: A review article. Political Science Quarterly, 138(4), 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad035
Markiewicz, T. (2024). The vulnerability of securitisation: the missing link of critical security studies. Contemporary Politics, 30(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2267371
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, Updated Edition. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company
Mokry, S. (2023). Grand strategy and the construction of the national interest: The underpinnings of Sino-US strategic competition. China International Strategy Review, 5(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-023-00122-0
Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
Müller, T. (2024).Narratives, Knowledge Objects, and the Making of Great Power Competition. Global Studies Quarterly, 4 (3). https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae059
Ndzendze, B. &Tshilidzi M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and International Relations Theories. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Olan, F., Jayawickrama, U., Arakpogun, E. O., Suklan, J., & Liu, S. (2022). Fake news on social media: The impact on society. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10242-z
Oluyemi, A. (2024). Great power competition and its implications on the global security architecture. Journal of Strategic Security Studies, 12(1), 45–62.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393301644
Owen IV, J. (2017, November 30). Liberalism and Security. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Retrieved 29 Oct. 2025, from https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-33
Rumelili, B. (2015). Identity and desecuritisation: The pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(1), 52–74
Sakamoto, T. (2023). Threat Conceptions in Global Security Discourse: Analyzing the Speech Records of the United Nations Security Council, 1990–2019. International Studies Quarterly, 67(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqad067
Scartozzi, C. M. (2022). Climate change in the UN Security Council: An analysis of discourses and organisational trends. International Studies Perspectives, 23(3), 290-312. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekac003
Segura Cuenca, M. C., & Erades Pérez, N. (2025). The role of social media as a source of information and perception of insecurity. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 31, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-025-09628-x
Smith, J., & Turner, L. (2023). Narratives, knowledge objects, and the making of great power competition. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae059
Stopfals.md. (2025). TOP falsuri distribuite în 2024 în Republica Moldova. https://stopfals.md/ro/article/top-falsuri-distribuite-in-2024-in-republica-moldova-181088
Torossian, R. (2023). The AI arms race in cybersecurity: Why trust is the ultimate defense. Security Magazine. https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/101510-the-ai-arms-race-in-cybersecurity-why-trust-is-the-ultimate-defense
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
Vakulina, S. (2025). Russia’s Disinformation Toolbox in Moldova: Bot Networks, Moscow Church Propaganda and Vote-Buying. Euronews.https://www.euronews.com/2025/09/24/russias-disinformation-toolbox-in-moldova-bot-networks-moscow-church-propaganda-and-vote-b
Vulpe, S-N., Rughiniș, R., Țurcanu, D., &Rosner, D. (2024). AI and cybersecurity: A risk society perspective. Frontiers in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1462250
Vultee, F. (2023). A media framing approach to securitization: Storytelling in conflict, crisis and threat. New York: Routledge
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
Wertman, D., & Kaunert, C. (2022). Societal security in theory and practice: Revisiting the Copenhagen School. Journal of International Relations and Development, 25(4), 991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00290-5
Xu, Z., & Shi, J. (2025). Research on the national security risk assessment model: A case study of political security in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 906.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05278-w
