VOTING FROM ABROAD AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF VOTING DECISION

Auteurs

  • ROMEO ASIMINEI Post-PhD fellow, SOP HRD /159/1.5/S/133675 Project, Romanian Academy Iaşi Branch (Romania); Academia Română, FilialaIaşi, str. T. Codrescu, nr.2, cod 700481, Iaşi. Acknowledgements: This paper is supported by the Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development (SOP HRD), financed from them European Social Fund and by the Romanian Government under the contract number POSDRU/159/1.5/S/133675.

Mots-clés :

Voting from abroad, Diaspora, presidential election, voting behavior, economic asset, political asset, electoral asset

Résumé

In 2009 Romanian Diaspora was protesting for its right to vote and in the end changed the presidential elections outcome through the votes casts from abroad. In 2014 Romanian Diaspora was protesting again for its right to vote and changed the presidential elections outcome not through direct voting but through the online influence. What happened? In Romania, the 2014 calculated democracy index (The Economist Intelligence Unit) was 6.68 from a maxim of 10 points, one of the lowest in EU. The political participation is also among the lowest in EU and reflects the continuous deterioration of the turnout in Romania over the post-communist period. However, the last presidential elections in Romania were characterized by an increase in the Diaspora’s intensity of electoral activity. Most of the votes came from Italy and Spain, countries with a higher democracy index. This paper analyses Romania’s Diaspora voting behavior with a focus on 2004, 2009 and 2014 presidential election in Italy and Spain. Our perspective is that we need to understand Diaspora as a constellation of three assets: economic asset (remittances), political asset (turnout) and electoral asset (votes cast from abroad). The paper is based on a secondary analysis on the data available on Romanian Permanent Electoral Authority database, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance database, Economist Intelligence Unit’s reports, National Bank of Romania’s reports and EUROSTAT data explorer. The paper is opening a series of further questions regarding the construction of Diaspora’s voting decision.

Références

Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1996). The civic culture. Bucureşti: Du Style.

Alexe, I. (2011). Al patrulea val. Migraţia creierilor pe ruta România - Occident. www.soros.ro.

Angi, D. et al. (2009). Reprezentarea politică şi votul românilor din străinătate. In Reprezentarea diasporei şi votul românilor din străinătate. Fundaţia Soroş România, Bucureşti. 10-50. www.soros.ro.

Asiminei, R. (2013). Sociologie electorală. Alegeri, alegători şi comportamente de vot. Iaşi: Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iaşi.

Asiminei R. (2015). Comunicarea interculturală şi construcţia deciziei de vot a diasporei. In Repere ale comunicării interculturale. Irina Frasin and Daniel Șandru (eds.), Bucureşti: Editura ProUniversitaria.

Burean, T. (2011). Political Participation by the Romanian Diaspora. In Sum P.E. and King, R.F. (eds.). Romania under Băsescu: Aspirations, Achievements, and Frustrations during His First Presidential Term, (pp. 83-105). Lanham: Lexington Books.

Castels, S. (2002). Migration and Community Formation under Conditions of

Globalization. International Migration Review, 36(4), 1143-1168.

Dahl, R. (2000). Poliarhiile. Participation and opposition. Iaşi: Institutul European.

Gamlen, A. (2006). Diaspora Engagement Policies: What Are They, and What Kinds of States Use Them? Working Paper, 6-32.Oxford: University of Oxford.

Economist Intelligence Unit (2006-2014). Democracy index.www.eiu.com.

EUROSTAT (2014). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/

submitViewTableAction.do. [accessed on 20.08.2014]

Glick Schiller, N. (2005). Transborder Citizenship: an Outcome of Legal Pluralism within Transnational Social Fields. Theory and Research in Comparative SocialAnalysis. Paper 25; http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclasoc/trcsa/25.

Grace, J. (2007). Challenging the Norms and Standards of Election Administration: External and Absentee Voting. In Challenging the Norms and Standards of Electoral Administration.IFES.35-58.

Grecu, S. (2012).Modele de analiză în consolidarea democratică. Perspective comparate în Europa central şi de est. Iaşi: Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași.

International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (2007). Voting from Abroad. The International IDEA Handbook. www.idea.int.

Lazea, V. (2014). România şi migraţii. National Bank of Romania. www.bnr.ro.

Netedu, A. (2008). The Demographical Aspects of Migration. Scientific Annals of “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi. (New Series) Sociology and Social Work Section. I (2008), 80-89.

Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (ed.) (2003). International Migration and Sending Countries: Perceptions, Policies and Transnational Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Putnam, R., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. (2001). How does democracy work? Iaşi: Polirom.

Romanian Permanent Electoral Authority (2014). Istoric electoral România (online database). www.roaep.ro.

Sandu, D., Alexandru, M. (2009). Migraţia şi consecinţele sale. In Preda, M. (ed.). Riscuri şi inechităţi sociale în România (pp. 287-304). Iaşi: Polirom.

Van Hear, N. (1998). New Diasporas: the mass exodus, dispersal and regrouping of migrant communities. London: UCL Press.

Waldinger, R., Fitzgerald, D. (2003). Immigrant ‘Transnationalism’ Reconsidered, Department of Sociology, UCLA. Paper 5, http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclasoc/5.

Publiée

2016-03-11

Numéro

Rubrique

2014 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS