The Greek word angelia means message. We use the word angel with regard to a divine messenger. There is an old theological tradition dealing with the study of such messengers, namely angelology. Angeletics is different from angelology as it is concerned with the study of natural and particularly of human messages and messengers. This does not mean that the analysis of the religious phenomenon is irrelevant (Serres, 1993). Quite the contrary, it is a contribution to the study of production, distribution, interpretation, storage, and control of messages and messengers in premodern societies. Angeletics in a narrow sense belongs to the Humanities and Social Sciences and is closely related to rhetoric (McElholm, 2001; Capurro, 1992). In a wider sense it deals with the study of messages as a natural phenomenon. In the first part of this paper I will briefly refer to angeletics as an interdisciplinary theory (Capurro, 2003). The second part deals with some questions concerning the difference between messages at the organic and the human level. Some insights are based on the online discussions at the „Electronic Conference on the Foundations of Information Science” (FIS, 2002). The concepts of message and information are closely related (Capurro/Hjørland, 2003). The twofold meaning of the Latin term informatio as 'moulding matter' and 'moulding the mind', i.e., the ontological meaning and today's prevailing epistemological use of information as message communication gives prima facie rise to an analogy between human communication and the question of message transmission at the sub-human level. I will argue that the interpretation of life processes as angeletic ones can be considered in its own right, i.e., beyond the realm of an analogy. An interdisciplinary message theory can become the basis of a complex, non-reductive view of the manifold hierarchies of communication.


angelia; information; angeletics; message; theory of communication

Full Text:

Full Text: PDF


Andrade, E. (2002): The Organization of Nature: Semiotic Agents as Intermediaries between Digital and Analog Informational Spaces

Capurro, R. (2003): Ethik im Netz. Stuttgart. Chapter: Theorie der Botschaft

- (2003a): Beiträge zu einer digitalen Ontologie

- (2002): Philosophical Presuppositions of Producing and Patenting Organic Life

- (2000): Hermeneutik im Vorblick

- (1996): “On the Genealogy of Information“. In: K. Kornwachs, K. Jacoby, Eds: Information. New Questions to a Multidisciplinary Concept. Berlin 1996, pp. 259-270.

- (1996a): „Informationsethik nach Kant und Habermas“. In: A. Schramm, Ed.: Philosophie in Österreich. Vienna, pp. 307-310.

- (1992): Foundations of Information Science

Capurro, R., Hjørland, B. (2003): “The Concept of Information“. In: B. Cronin (Ed.): Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Medford, New Jersey, Vol. 37, pp. 343- 411.

Diebner, H.H. (2003): A model of how brains model the world. Paper presented at the International Symposium „Dynamical Systems in Cognitive Science”, Ascona 18-22, 2003.

FIS (2002): Electronic Conference on Foundations of Information Science

Flusser, V. (1996): Kommunikologie. Mannheim.

Heidegger, M. (1987): Being and Time. Oxford (Transl. by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson)

- (1983): Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik. Welt - Endlichkeit - Einsamkeit. Frankfurt a. M. 1983 (GA 29/30).

ICIE (2004): International Center for Information Ethics, International Congress: Localizing the Internet. Ethical Issues in Intercultural Perspective

Jung, M. (2002): Hermeneutik zur Einführung. Hamburg.

Luhmann, N. (1987): Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt a. Main.

McElholm, d. (2001): „Message“. In: G. Ueding, Ed.: Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Tübingen, Vol. 5, pp. 1081-1087.

Nietzsche, F. (1999): Der Antichrist. In: Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. By G. Colli and M. Montinari. Munich.

Serres, M. (1993): La légende des anges. Paris.

Shannon, C. (1948): “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”. In: Bell System Technical Journal, 27, pp. 379-423, pp. 623-656.

Shannon, C., Weaver, W. (1972): The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press (Original work published in 1949).

Sloterdijk, P. (1997): “Kantilenen der Zeit”. In: Lettre International, 36, pp, 71-77.

Stegmüller, W. (1979): Rationale Rekonstruktion von Wissenschaft und ihrem Wandel. Stuttgart.

Weizsäcker, C.F. von (1974): Die Einheit der Natur. Munich.


  • There are currently no refbacks.