COMPORTAMENTUL VIZUAL ÎN RELAŢIILE INTERPERSONALE

Marian PANAINTE

Abstract


In this paper, we attempted to present some models and conclusions of the empirical researches on the visual non-verbal behavior. Gazing represents an important source of information which affects implicitly and explicitly the interlocutor, having the role of balancing the subjective interpersonal distance, the conversation rhythm, and the other individual’s reactions. We discussed various components and associated parameters of ocular movements, by relating them to the interpersonal relations, both with their author and with their observer. In the first part of the paper, we reviewed the studies on attractiveness and their influences on gazing, and also researches which point out the identification – based on the indices provided by the eyes and gaze movements – of the degree to which the interlocutor speaks the truth. We discussed as well the role of intimacy, of gender differences, of power and dominance on the visual behavior adjustment. Finally, we revised researches illustrating the way in which the visual behavior influences the persuasion degree in delivered messages.


Keywords


nonverbal communication; ocular behavior; eye contact; visual dominance; gaze

Full Text:

Full Text: PDF

References


AIELLO, J. R., 1972. ”A test of equilibrium theory: Visual interaction in relation to orientation, distance, and sex of interactants”. Psychonomic Science 27:335-336.

ANDERSON, D. R., 1976. ”Eye contact, topic intimacy, and equilibrium theory”. The Journal of Social Psychology 100 (2): 313-314.

ARGYLE, M. şi DEAN, J.1965.”Eye-contact, distance and affiliation”. Sociometry 28: 289-304.

BENTE, G., DONAGHY, W. C. şi SUWELACK, D. 1998. ”Sex Differences in Body Movement and Visual Attention: an Integrated Analysis of Movement and Gaze in Mixedsex Dyads”.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 22 (1): 31-58.

BURGOON, J. K., COKER, D. A., şi COKER, R. A. 1986. ”Communicative effects of gaze behavior: A test of two contrasting explanations”. Human Communication Research 12: 495-524.

EXLINE, R. V., ELLYSON, S. L., and LONG, B. 1975. ”Visual behavior as an aspect of power role relationships”. In Advances in the study of communication and affect, vol. 2, edited by P. PLINER, L. KRAMES şi T. ALLOWAY, 21-52. New York: Plenum Press.

FARABBEE, D. F., HOLCOM M. L., RAMSEY, S. L., COLE, S. 1993. ”Social Anxiety and Speaker Gaze in a Persuasive Atmosphere”. Journal of Research in Personality 27: 365-376

FROMING, W. J., WALKER, G.R. şi LOPYAN, K. J. 1982. ”Public and private self awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18: 476-487.

GUERRERO, L. K. şi KORY, F. 2006. Nonverbal Communication in Close Relationships. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

JANIK, S. W. WELLENS, A. R., GOLDBERG, M. L., şi DELOSSE, L. F. 1978. ”Eyes as the center of focus in the visual examination of faces”. Perceptual and Motor Skills 26: 34–35.

KOPACZ, M. 2006. “Non-verbal communication as a persuasion tool: current status and future directions”. Rocky Mountains Communication Review 3 (1):4-23.

LAMB, T. A. 1981. ”Nonverbal and paraverbal control in dyads and triads: Sex or power differences?”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44:49-53

MEHRABIAN, A. şi WILLIAMS, M. 1969. ”Nonverbal comitants and intened persuasiveness”. Journal of Personality and Social psychology 13: 37-58

SCHWARTZ, B., TESSER, A. şi POWELL, E. 1982. ”Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45: 114-120.

SOMMER, R. 1971. ”Spatial parameters in naturalistic research”. In Behavior and environment: The use of space in animals, edited by A. H. ESSER, 281-290. New York: Plenum.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.