When discussing today about what we call `Byzantine cultural model` we encounter some difficulties in its characterization, arising from the insufficient understanding the resorts which animated it. There are a number of decisive `themes`, often implicitly present, that influenced the thinking and life of the Byzantines, regardless of age. We can call them `assumptions`: their identification can be revealing in tracing the coordinates of a model that is decisive for the identity of the Eastern European areal of today. And their knowledge allows a more adequate understanding of what is called `Reality` in this tradition: a notion
with much more complex signification than today`s usage.


Presuppositions; Cultural Model; Eastern-Christianity; Body; Soul

Full Text:

Full Text: PDF


Dilthey, Wilhelm,”The Formation of Historical World in the Human Sciences” in Selected Works, vol. III. Trans. Rudolf A. Makkreel and John

Scanlon. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.

Louh, Andrew, Dionisie Areopagitul.O introducere, Deisis, Sibiu, 1997.

Maxim, Mărturisitorul, Ambigua, ”Părinți și Scriitori Bisericești”, vol. 80, Ed. Institutului Biblic şi de Misiune al B.O.R., București, 1983.

Maxim, Mărturisitorul, Mistagogia. Cosmosul și sufletul. Chipuri ale Bisericii, Ed. Institutului Biblic și de misiune al B.O.R., București, 2000.

Nellas, Panayotis, Deification in Christ: Orthodox Perspectives on the Nature of the Human Person. Trans. Norman Russell. Crestwood: St.

Vladimir`s Seminary Press: 1987.

Proclus, The Elements of Theology, Clarendon, Oxford, 1963.

Thunberg, Lars, Microcosm and Mediator: The Theological Anthropology of Maximus the Confessor. Chicago: Open Court, 1995.

Zizioulas, Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. New York: St. Vladimir`s Seminary Press, 1985.

Yannaras, Christos, Person and Eros. Trans. Norman Russell. Brookline: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 2007.


  • There are currently no refbacks.