ADDRESSING THE CHALLENGES OF GIG WORK IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: A REVIEW OF THE PLATFORM WORK DIRECTIVE

Authors

  • Lucian SFETCU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47743/asas-2024-2-769

Keywords:

Gig Economy; Platform Work; European Union; Employment Status Classification; Algorithmic Management; Labour Protections; Social Security; Directive on Platform Work

Abstract

The gig economy in the European Union (EU) has significantly transformed traditional labour markets, prompting critical discussions about worker rights and protections. This article presents a narrative review of the literature on gig work within the EU, focusing on the Platform Work Directive. It explores the challenges of employment status classification, rights and protections for gig workers, the role of algorithmic management, social security inclusion, the impact on platform companies, and policy implications. By synthesizing existing research, the article highlights the broader policy implications for labour protection across the EU and considers potential future developments in this rapidly evolving sector.

Author Biography

Lucian SFETCU

Lecturer, PhD., Department of Sociology, Social Work and Human Resources, Faculty of Philosophy and Social-Political Sciences, „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, Romania

References

Aloisi, A. (2020). Platform Work in the European Union: Lessons Learned, Legal Developments and Challenges Ahead. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556922

Aloisi, A. (2022). Platform work in Europe: Lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead. In EUROPEAN LABOUR LAW JOURNAL (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 4–29). SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211062557

Aloisi, A., Rainone, S., & Countouris, N. (2023). An unfinished task? Matching the Platform Work Directive with the EU and international “social acquis.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4670722

Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645

Aysan, M. F. (2020). Access to Social Protection by Immigrants, Emigrants and Resident Nationals in Turkey. In IMISCOE Research Series (pp. 389–400). Springer International Publishing.

Bajwa, U., Gastaldo, D., Di Ruggiero, E., & Knorr, L. (2018). The health of workers in the global gig economy. Globalization and Health, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8

Bucher, E. L., Schou, P. K., & Waldkirch, M. (2021). Pacifying the algorithm – Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961531

Cavallini, G., & Avogaro, M. (2019). Digital work in the platform economy: The last (but not least) stage o f precariousness in labour relationships. In Precarious Work. Edward Elgar Publishing.

De Stefano, V. (2015). The Rise of the “Just-in-Time Workforce”: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the “Gig-Economy.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602

De Stefano, V. (2016). Introduction: Crowdsourcing, the Gig-Economy and the Law.

Deon, L. (2020). Regulating the Scope of Employment in the Gig Economy: Towards Enhance d Rights at Work in the Age of Uber. LSE Law Review, 5, 190–208. https://doi.org/10.61315/lselr.83

Drahokoupil, J., & Fabo, B. (2016). The Platform Economy and the Disruption of the Employment Relationship. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2809517

European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2018). European legal framework for “digital labour platforms.” Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2760/78590

European Parliament. (2024). DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on improving working conditions in platform work.

Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03

Garben, S. (2019). The regulatory challenge of occupational safety and health in the onli ne platform economy. International Social Security Review, 72(3), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12215

Gebert, R. (2023). “Can You Complete Your Delivery?” Comparing Canadian and European Union Legal Statuses of Platform Workers. Politics and Governance, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6833

Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6

Hassel, A., & Sieker, F. (2022). The platform effect: How Amazon changed work in logistics in Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(3), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801221082456

Henten, A., & Windekilde, I. (2018). Implications of ICT-based platforms on labor markets – the case of Uber. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 131, 75–96. https://doi.org/10.18276/epu.2018.131/2-08

Hernandez, R. H. (Lindy), Song, Q., Kou, Y., & Gui, X. (2024). “At the end of the day, I am accountable”: Gig Workers’ Self-Tracking for Multi-Dimensional Accountability Management. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642151

Hsieh, J., Adisa, O., Bafna, S., & Zhu, H. (2023). Designing Individualized Policy and Technology Interventions to Improve Gig Work Conditions. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596671.3598576

Hsieh, J., Karger, M., Zagal, L., & Zhu, H. (2023). Co-Designing Alternatives for the Future of GigWorker Well-Being. In DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, DIS 2023 (pp. 664–687). ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3595982

Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 205395172110203. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332

Kalleberg, A. L., & Dunn, M. (2016). Good Jobs, Bad Jobs in the Gig Economy. Perspectives on Work, 20, 10–75.

Katiyatiya, L. M., & Lubisi, N. (2024). The current social protection discourse, gig economy within the advent of COVID-19: Some emerging legal arguments. Labor History, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2024.2340610

Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2019). Work and Value Creation in the Platform Economy. In S. P. Vallas & A. Kovalainen (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Work (Vol. 33, pp. 13–41). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320190000033003

Kerikmäe, T., & Kajander, A. (2022). Gig economy workers in the European Union: Towards change in their legal classification. In REVISTA CIDOB D AFERS INTERNATIONALS (Issue 131, pp. 117–139). FUNDACIO CIDOB. https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2022.131.2.117

Kurianov, N. (2023). Precarization as a form of negative impact of digital transformation on the system of labor rights realization. E3S Web of Conferences, 403, 08034. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340308034

Larkin, P. (2021). Chapter 5 Relationship between Employment Status and Scope of Social S ecurity Protection: The United Kingdom Example. In Social Law 4.0 (pp. 117–146). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.

Liang, X., Fu, W., Luo, P., & Huo, Y. (2024). Challenge or Hindrance? The Dual Impact of Algorithmic Control on Gig Workers’ Prosocial Service Behaviors. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060497

Makó, C., Illéssy, M., Pap, J., & Nosratabadi, S. (2022). Emerging Platform Work in the Context of the Regulatory Loophole (The Uber Fiasco in Hungary). Journal of Labor and Society, 26(4), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10054

Mangan, D., Muszyński, K., & Pulignano, V. (2023). The platform discount: Addressing unpaid work as a structural feature of labour platforms. European Labour Law Journal, 14(4), 541–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231210550

Mangold, S. (2024). Platform work and traditional employee protection: The need for altern ative legal approaches. European Labour Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525241260878

Montebovi, S., Fernandez, A. B., & Schoukens, P. (2020). New Work Forms: How to Integrate Them in Our Social Insurances. Wirtschaftsdienst, 100(S1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2615-5

Murphy, C., & Dundon, T. (2023). Regulating Artificial Intelligence and Platform Work in Europe: Manipulating the (digital) extraction of value. International Union Rights, 30(3), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/iur.2023.a915987

Naik, N. V. (2023). Code on Social Security: An Impact Analysis on Labour and Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4449967

Nilsen, M., Kongsvik, T., & Almklov, P. G. (2022). Splintered structures and workers without a workplace: How should safety science address the fragmentation of organizations? In SAFETY SCIENCE (Vol. 148). ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105644

Nilsen, M., Kongsvik, T., & Antonsen, S. (2022). Taming Proteus: Challenges for Risk Regulation of Powerful Digital Labor Platforms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106196

Pietrogiovanni, V. (2019). L’importanza di chiamarsi lavoratori, ossia delle corti del Regno Unit o alle (p)rese con il lavoro a chiamata attraverso le piattaforme. Labour & Law Issues, Vol 5, No 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.2421-2695/9610

Pilatti, G. R., Pinheiro, F. L., & Montini, A. A. (2024). Systematic Literature Review on Gig Economy: Power Dynamics, Worker Autonomy, and the Role of Social Networks. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100267

Pinsof, J. (2016). A New Take on an Old Problem: Employee Misclassification in the Modern Gig-Economy. Michigan T Elecommunications and T Echnology Law Review, 22, 341–373.

Ponce del Castillo, A., & Naranjo, D. (2022). Regulating Algorithmic Management: An Assessment Of The EC’s Draft Dir ective On Improving Working Conditions In Platform Work. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4243530

Purcell, C., & Garcia, R. (2021). Indecent Work? The Rise of Digital Platform Work in France and the United Kingdom. In F. Christie, M. Antoniadou, K. Albertson, & M. Crowder (Eds.), Decent Work (pp. 99–112). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-586-920211008

Radović-Marković, M. (2021). The Transformation of Work in a Global Knowledge Economy. In M. Radović-Marković, B. Đukanović, D. Marković, & A. Dragojević (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and work in the gig economy: The case of the western Balkans (pp. 63–73). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003155409-9/transformation-work-global-knowledge-economy-mirjana-radović-marković

Rajkumar Chaudhary, S., & Prajapati, P. (2024). Unveiling the invisible: Examining the legal complexity and social security benefits of gig workers. International Journal of Advanced Research, 12(03), 831–838. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/18460

Renzi, S. (2023). La trasparenza dei sistemi algoritmici utilizzati nel contesto lavorativo fra legislazione europea e ordinamento interno. La Nuova Giuridica, 2(2), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.36253/lng-1976

Silberman, M. S. (2023). The concept of the ‘digital labour platform.’ SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4509153

Stylogiannis, C. (2023). The effective application of the right to collective bargaining for self-employed (platform) workers: ‘Not such an easy task.’ European Labour Law Journal, 14(4), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231194278

Sun, T., & Li, Y. (2024). Effect of Algorithmic Transparency on Gig Workers’ Proactive Service Performance: A Moderated Chain Mediation Model. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 14(04), 462–491. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2024.144024

Tan, Z. M., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis. In TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY (Vol. 65). ELSEVIER SCI LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101594

Todoli-Signes, A. (2017). The `gig economy’: Employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? In TRANSFER-EUROPEAN REVIEW OF LABOUR AND RESEARCH (Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp. 193–205). SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381

Veale, M., Silberman, M. `Six’, & Binns, R. (2023). Fortifying the algorithmic management provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive. In EUROPEAN LABOUR LAW JOURNAL (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 308–332). SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231167983

Vyas, N. (2020). ‘Gender inequality- now available on digital platform’: An interplay b etween gender equality and the gig economy in the European Union. European Labour Law Journal, 12(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952520953856

Weber, M., De Jong, A., & Remus, U. (2023). Opaque Overwatch: How Food-Delivery Workers Make Sense of Algorithmic Management in the Gig Economy. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2023(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2023.13983abstract

Wynn, M., & Paz-Fuchs, A. (2019). Flexicurity outside the employment relationship? Re-engineering social security for the new economy. In Social Security Outside the Realm of the Employment Contract. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Yoel, S. M., & Hasym, M. W. (2021). Healthcare Protection for Gig Workers: A Brief Case During Pandemic. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210506.053

Published

26-12-2024