AROMANIANS AND COSMOPOLITANISM

Authors

  • Diana MARGARIT PhD, Lecturer at the Department of Political Science, International Relations and European Studies, “Al. I. Cuza” University of Iasi
  • Emilian MARGARIT PhD

Keywords:

Aromanians, cosmopolitanism, identity, minority, recognition.

Abstract

The Aromanian problem is in fact, what Balkans have lost when nation-states rose. This article is divided in two main parts: the one regarding the elements which describe Aromanians through the historical doxa and understanding, trying to set up the question regarding their identity; the other one regarding the solutions brought by cosmopolitan theses and discourses in order to assure their recognition and preservation. Our goal is not to stigmatize the nation-state paradigm, but to highlight its limits in respect to itself and to cosmopolitanism.

References

Beck, U. (2006). The Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beck, U. (2009). Critical Theory of World Risk Society: A Cosmopolitan Vision. Constellations 16(1), 3-22.

Calhoun, C. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 14(3), 427-448.

Cheah, P. (2006). Cosmopolitanism. Theory, Culture & Society 23(2-3), 486-496.

Delanty, G. (2009). The Cosmopolitan Imagination. The Renewal of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Du Nay, A. (1996). The Origins of the Rumanians. Toronto: Matthias Corvinus Publishing.

Fine, R. and Boon, V. (2007). Cosmopolitanism: Between Past and Future. European Journal of Social Theory 10(1), 5-16.

Friedman, A. (2001). The Vlah Minority in Macedonia: Language, Identity, Dialectology, and Standardization. In Juhani Nuoluoto, Martii Leiwo and Jussi Halla-aho (eds.). Selected Papers in Slavic, Balkan, and Balkan Studies, 26-50. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

Gauss, K.-M. (2002). Sterbenden Europäer: Unterwegs zu den Sepharden von Sarajevo, Gottscheer Deutschen, Arbereshe, Sorben und Aromunen. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag.

Goodman, J. (2002). Nationalism and Globalism: Social Movement Responses. The International Scope 4(8), 1-17.

Hassner, P. (1998). Refugees: a Special Case for Cosmopolitan Citizenship. In Archibugi, D., Held D. and Köhler M. (eds.). Re-imagining Political Community, 252-272. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the Vernacular. Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.

Motta, G. (2011). The Fight for Balkan Latinity. The Aromanians until World War I. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 2(3), 252-260.

Poghirc, C. (2012). Romanizarea lingvistică şi culturală în Balcani. Supravieţuiri şi evo-luţie. In Djuvara N. (ed.). Aromânii. Istorie, limbă, destin, 15-58. București: Humanitas.

Poulton, H. (2000). Who Are the Macedonians?. London: Indiana University Press.

Robertson, R. (2000). Globalization. Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.

Scholte, J. A. (2000). Globalization. A Critical Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Schwandner-Sievers, S. (2002). Dawn for a ‘Sleeping Beauty Nations’. Aromanians Identity Politics and Conflicts in Post-Communist Albania. In Kaser, K. and Kressing, F. (eds.). Albania – A country in transition. Aspects of changing identities in a south-east European country, 147-163. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Waldron, J. (2000). What is Cosmopolitan?. The Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2), 227-243.

Wolff, S. (2009). Ethnic Minorities in Europe: The Basic Facts. Accessed January 15, 2013. http://www.stefanwolff.com/files/min-eu.pdf.

Additional Files

Published

20-07-2015