• OVIDIU GHERASIM-PROCA Lecturer at Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Faculty of Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences, Departament of Political Science, International Relations and European Studies


neoliberalism, evaluation, university reform, developmental policy, Popular Republic of China, Communist Party of China


Over the years, as the all-encompassing processes of globalization and neoliberalization unfolded, the Popular Republic of China increasingly deepened its developmental policies intended to increase its technological and economic competitiveness. Chinese universities experimented with various forms of managerial techniques imported from the West, including those inspired by the neoliberal ideology. Their achievements in the field of tertiary education were so impressive that they easily became a source of inspiration for neoliberal managers aspiring to „excellence” all around the world. On the other hand, in post-socialist Europe, stuck in an unsatisfying and unfulfilled search for ideal neoliberal productivity models, Romanian university managers are still obsessing with pushing their institutions among the ones listed by the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), while many Romanian researchers are seeking to publish in Chinese journals. Some of them look up with envy to the generous incentives that Chinese public universities are providing in order to increase their publication output. However, the interest for debating or critically understanding the governance behind all these trends is barely visible. More often than not, researchers and experts alike are happy to believe that their academic work has nothing to do with politics or ideology. Few are questioning the political bases of neoliberal reforms at home, and even fewer are trying find out more about what really happens in China. In this paper I will try to incite questions or working hypotheses about the ideology of neoliberal competitiveness by encouraging Romanian readers to reflect upon issues and debates informed by the prestige-driven university reforms experimented over the last three decades by the Popular Republic of China. Also, the paper will provide some useful bibliographical suggestions for those who want to dive deeper and better understand recent policy directions adopted by the Communist Party of China in this field.


C.I. (2020, June 29). Universitățile românești—Apariții răzlețe în clasamentele Shanghai Ranking, după materiile de studiu / Babeș-Bolyai—Cele mai multe apariții.

Deng Xiaoping. (1987). Câteva opinii despre activitatea din domeniile științei și învățământului. Cuvântare la forumul lucrătorilor din domeniile științei și învățământului—8 august 1977. In Opere alese (p. 43). Editura Politică.

Direcția Comunicare și Relații Publice a Universității Babeș-Bolyai. (2020, August 15). UBB este singura universitate a țării prezentă în prestigiosul clasament Shanghai al universităților lumii. NEWSUBB.

Frenkiel, É. (2011). Preliminary Remarks Concerning the Situation of Chinese Academics. Critique internationale, 50(1), 129–144.

Hagve, M. (2020). The money behind academic publishing. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, Ny Raekke, 140(11).

Hladchenko, M., & Moed, H. F. (2021). The effect of publication traditions and requirements in research assessment and funding policies upon the use of national journals in 28 post-socialist countries. Journal of Informetrics, 15(4).

Huang, Y., Li, R., Zhang, L., & Sivertsen, G. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 300–326.

Ionescu, C. (2021, April 30). Finanțarea publică pentru universitățile românești a reatins în 2020 nivelul din 2008, când a început prăbușirea / Creșterea s-a suprapus unei scăderi abrupte a numărului de studenți și profesori—Analiză europeană.

Jacob, W. J., Mok, K. H., Cheng, S. Y., & Xiong, W. (2018). Changes in Chinese higher education: Financial trends in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 64–85.

Kewen, S. (2004). The Beida Reform. Chinese Education & Society, 37(6), 60–70.

Lynch, K. (2015). Control by numbers: New managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 190–207.

Mallapaty, S. (2020). China bans cash rewards for publishing papers. Nature, 579(7797), 18–18.

Mitter, R., & Johnson, E. (2021, May 1). What the West Gets Wrong About China. Harvard Business Review.

MoChridhe, R. (2021). The Hidden Language Policy of China’s Research Evaluation Reform. In S. Kehoe & G. Wielander (Eds.), Cultural China 2020: The Contemporary China Centre Review (pp. 117–121). University of Westminster Press.

Nan, L. (2004). Why Do They Criticize Beida’s Reform? Chinese Education & Society, 37(6), 71–84.

Qingnian, X., & Yinghua, C. (2020). The Reconstruction of the University Academic Committee System and Government Regulation. Chinese Education & Society, 53(4), 198–211.

Schiermeier, Q. (2018). China backs bold plan to tear down journal paywalls. Nature, 564(7735), 171–172.

Tang, L. (2019). Five ways China must cultivate research integrity. Nature, 575(7784), 589–591.

Tao, T. (2020, February 27). New Chinese Policy Could Reshape Global STM Publishing. The Scholarly Kitchen.

Tao, T. (2020a, May 11). Chinese Publishers React to New Policies on Research Evaluation. The Scholarly Kitchen.

Tennant, J. P. (2020). Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge. European Science Editing, 46, 1-3.

Tollefson, J. (2018). China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles. Nature, 553(7689), 390–390.

Wang, J., Halffman, W., & Zwart, H. (2021). The Chinese scientific publication system: Specific features, specific challenges. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 105–115.

Xiaochun, W., & Dan, J. (2007). Scientific and Ethical Reflections on Academic Corruption in Universities: On the Science Research Evaluation System in China’s Universities. Chinese Education & Society, 40(6), 67–76.

Xie, Y., Zhang, C., & Lai, Q. (2014). China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(26), 9437–9442.

Yang, G. (2005). The Beida Reform Follows the Example of “Peach Pickers” but Should Spend More Time “Planting Peach Trees.” Chinese Education & Society, 38(1), 75–79.

Zhang, L., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). The New Research Assessment Reform in China and Its Implementation. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2(1), 3.