COMMUNICATION PERFORMANCE IN THE PUBLIC SPACE. IS THERE STILL ROOM FOR ARGUMENTATION THEORIES IN THE CONTEXT OF INFODEMIA?
Abstract
Keywords
References
Adams, S. (2017). Win Bigly: Persuasion in A World where Facts Don’t Matter. New York: Portfolio/ Penguin.
Cameron, K. A. (2009). A practitioner’s guide to persuasion: An overview of 15 selected persuasion theories, models and frameworks. Patient Education and Counseling, 74, 309-317.
Doury, M. & Moirand, S. eds. (2004). L’Argumentation aujourd’hui (textes reunis). Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.
Grize, J.-B. (1996). Logique naturelle et communications. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Henkemans, F. (2017). Argumentation. Analysis and evaluation. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Lamy, B. (1998). La rhetorique ou l’art de parler. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (2012). Noua retorică. Tratat de argumentare. Iași: Editura Universității « Alexandru Ioan Cuza ».
Skerlep, A. (2001). Re-evaluating the role of rhetoric in public relation theory and in strategies of corporate discourse. Journal of Communication Management, 6 (2), 176-188.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
van Eemeren, F.; Grootendorst, R. & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (1996). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporany Developments. New Jersey : Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
van Eemeren, F., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.