Hume and the Political in Deleuzes Transcendent al Empiricism

EMILIAN MĂRGĂRIT

Abstract


The aim of this article is to draw the political line that is intersected with various aspects of Deleuze work on the philosophy of David Hume. This particular line will be understood as an exercise of thought regarding the nature of politics involving the concepts forged by Deleuze within Hume's Treatise. I will start from the suppositions that are linked to experience and move to clarify the nature of our tendencies. The point of my commencement is to understand the relations sketched between needs and institutions and to clarify the particularity of Deleuze interpretation of Hume. The next distinction that I will have in attention is that amid Nature and Culture and the position that Hume is emphasizing regarding this distinction. After that my purpose is to explain the concepts and the coherence of Hume's political philosophy that Deleuze is producing in his interpretation. The nature of politics that constitutes the exercise of thought of Deleuze's Hume empiricism is an institutional theory opposed to contractualist theories.


Keywords


Keywordsmind; passions; imagination; institutions; tendencies; procedures

References


Deleuze, G. (1987). Dilogues. Gilles Deleuze and Claire Parnet. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G. (1991). Empiricism and Subjectivity. Translated by Constantin V. Boundas. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G. (2004). Instincts and Institutions in Desert Islands and Other Texts 1953-1974. Edited by David Lapoujade. Translated by Michael Taomina. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e) Foreign Agents Series.

Deleuze, G. (2006). Preface for the American Edition of Empiricism and Subjectivity in Two Regimes of Madness: Texts and Interviews 1975-1995. Edited by David Lapoujade. Translated by Ames Hodges and Michael Taormina. New York: Semiotext(e).

Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature: being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1993). Opus Postumum. Translated by Eckart Frster and Michael Rosen. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Michaud, Y. (1999). Hume et la fin de la philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.