What Do We Choose: the Leaders, the Parties or the Ideologies? A Case Study for the 2016-2020 Local Elections in Romania, in Iași County

Authors

  • Dorina Țicu

Keywords:

electoral system, local election, lider, political party, ideology, electoral behavior

Abstract

This article aims to make a theoretical incursion on electoral behavior highlighting/ stressing the key-factors which could influence voters’ electoral decision: the relations between political leaders and the parties they belong to, the left-right ideology of political parties/leaders.
Starting from the theoretical analyses carried out especially for the electoral rounds at national/central level, the article aims to outline the formula of determinism between local leaders appointed for Mayors in local elections in order to influence the results of electoral elections in relation to the vote obtained by parties for the nomination of elected representatives proposed for Local Councils/parties to which they belong, also appealing to the left-right ideological dimension, represented by the two parties that dominated political life after 1989 in Romania, PSD (Social-Democrat Party) and PNL (National Liberal Party), respectively.
The proposed analysis is a quantitative, an exploratory and a comparative one, starting from the results obtained in Iasi County in the local elections of 2016-2020 for the appointment of Mayors (political leader) and of Local Councils (party/ideology).

Author Biography

Dorina Țicu

Associate Lecturer PhD, "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi, Faculty of Philosophy and Social-Political Sciences, Department of Political Sciences, International Relations and European Studies

References

Aaldering, L., van der Meer, T., Van der Brug, W. (2018). Mediated Leader Effects: The Impact of Newspapers’ Portrayal of Party Leadership on Electoral Support. The International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 23(1) 70–94.

Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bittner, A. (2011). Platform orPersonality? The Role of Party Leaders in Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blais, A., Bol, D., Bowler, S., Farrell, D.M., Fredén, A., Foucault, M., Heisbourg, E., Lachat, R., Lago, I., Loewen, P.J., Nemčok, M., Pilet, J-B., Plescia, C. (2021). What Kind of Electoral Outcome do People Think is Good for Democracy?. Political Studies, 1–22, pp. 2-24.

Bornschier, S. (2010). Cleavage politics and the populist right: The new cultural conflict in Western Europe. Temple University Press

Bornschier, S., Hausermann, S., Zollinger, D., Colombo, C. (2021). How “Us” and “Them” Relates to Voting Behavior—Social Structure, Social Identities, and Electoral Choice. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 54(12), pp. 2087–2122.

Burgoon, B., van Noort, S., Rooduijn, M., & Underhill, G. (2019). Positional deprivation and support for radical right and radical left parties. Economic Policy, 34(97), pp. 49–93.

Elchardus, M., & Spruyt, B. (2012). The contemporary contradictions of egalitarianism: An empirical analysis of the relationship between the old and new left/right alignments. European Political Science Review, 4(2), pp. 217–239.

Gallagher, M., Laver, M., Mair, P. (2011). Representative Government in Modern Europe. 5th edn. London: McGraw-Hill.

Gingrich, J., & Häusermann, S. (2015). The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(1), pp. 50–75.

Greene, S. (2001). The Role of Character Assessments in Presidential Approval. American Politics Research, 29 (2), pp. 196–210.

Häusermann, S., & Kriesi, H. (2015). What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. The politics of advanced capitalism, (pp. 202–230). Cambridge University Press.

Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), pp. 109–135.

Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2019). Democracy and prosperity. Reinventing capitalism through a turbulent century. Cambridge University Press.

Kurer, T. (2020). The declining middle: Occupational change, social status, and the populist right. Comparative Political Studies, 53(10−11), pp. 1798–1835.

Manow, P. (2018). Die politische ökonomie des populismus. Suhrkamp.

Maxwell, R. (2019). Cosmopolitan immigration attitudes in large European cities: Contextual or compositional effects?. American Political Science Review, 113(2), pp.1–19.

Oesch, D., & Rennwald, L. (2018). Electoral competition in Europe’s new tripolar political space: Class voting for the left, centre-right and radical right. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4), pp.783–807.

Ohr, D., Oscarsson, H. (2013). Leader Traits, Leader Image, and Vote Choice. Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.187–214.

Rovny, J., & Polk, J. (2019). New wine in old bottles: Explaining the dimensional structure of European party systems. Party Politics, 25(1), pp.12–24.

Strom, K., Swindle, S.M. (2002). Strategic Parliamentary Dissolution. American Political Science Review, 96 (3), pp. 575–579.

Warwick, P. (1994). Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

31-12-2024