MEASURING THE RISK OF DEMOCRATIC DISORDER. STATISTICAL MODEL FOR POLITICAL ENTROPY
Keywords:
democracy, political entropy, internal factors, external factors risk factors, quantitative model, conditional entropyAbstract
This paper aims to introduce a new statistical measure related to the level of equilibrium and disequilibrium in democratic political systems. Following the traditional normative and empirical political theory, the paper introduces several categories related to the risk of political entropy in various democratic systems. We propose, in accordance with the Shannon entropy model, a new quantitative perspective in which we take into consideration relevant predictors of democratic stability which are theorized in political sciences. Elections, governance, civil rights and participative political culture are the core of liberal democracy. In this respect, we integrated these factors into the field of endogenous variables of democracy. External factors are represented by the level of militarization, economic dimension and interactions between political systems in the international arena. Besides the internal and external dimensions of democracy, we aim to introduce new risk factors, specific to the beginning of the XXIst century such as human and social development, online mass media, political polarization, the level of security and safety and terrorist threats. However, we propose a composite measure of the political entropy, based on conditional entropies associated with internal, external and risk factors.
References
Almond, G. & Verba, S. (1996). Cultura Civică, Atitudini politice şi democraţie în cinci naţiuni, Bucureşti: Editura Du Style.
Almond, G. & Powell Jr. B.G. & Strøm, K. & Dalton, R. (2004). Comparative Politics Today, A World View. New York: Pearson Longman.
Applebaum, A. (2020). Twilight of Democracy: the Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism. New York: Doubleday, Penguin Random House LLC.
Baehr, P. & Richter, M. (2004). Dictatorship in History and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blühdorn, I. & Butzlaff, F. (2019). Rethinking Populism: Peak democracy, liquid identity and the performance of sovereignty. European Journal of Social Theory, 22, (2),191-211.
Buzan, B. & Weaver, O. (2003). Regions and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, A. R. (2000). Poliarhiile. Participare și opoziție. Iași: Editura Institutul European.
Davies, J. & Gurr, T.R. (2009). Preventive Measures: Building Risk Assessment and Crisis Early Warning Systems, In Gerardo L. Munck (Ed.), Measuring Democracy, A Bridge Between Scholarship & Politics, Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26, 141-155.
Diamond, L.(2019). Ill Winds: Saving democracy from Russian Rage, Chinese Ambition, and American Complacency. New York: Penguin Press.
Diamond, L. & Chu, Y. & Plattner, M. & Tien, H. (2004). Cum se Consolidează Democrația. Iași: Editura Polirom.
Hoewe, J. & Peacock, C. (2019).The power of media in shaping political attitudes. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 19–24.
Human Development Index, United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 2021–2022. Available online: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22.
Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, The Human Development Sequence.
Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19, (2), 184-208.
Kekic, L. (2007). The Economist Intelligence Unit’s index of democracy, The Economist Intelligence Unit, available online at: https://www.economist.com/media/pdf/democracy_index_2007_v3.pdf
Kelly, D. (2017). Populism and the History of Popular Sovereignty. In Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul A. Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, Pierre Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, 511-534, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Levendusky, M. & Malhotra, N. (2015). Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes? Political Communication, 2, 283-301.
Levitsky, S. & Way, L. (2015). The Myth of Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy, 26, (1), 45-58.
Linz, J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Comunist Europe. Baltimore-London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political Man. The social basis of politics. New York: Dubleday & Company.
Marquardt, K. L. (2022). V-Dem Methodology: Aggregating Expert Assessments, In Democracy Report 2022, Autocratization changing nature?, V-Dem Institute, available online at: https://v-dem.net/media/publications/dr_2022.pdf
Moffitt, B. (2015). How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism. Government and Opposition, 50, (2), 189–217.
Møller, J. (2009). Post-communist Regime Change, A comparative study. London & New York: Routledge.
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Munck, G.L. (2009). Measuring Democracy, A Bridge Between Scholarship & Politics. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Näsström, S. (2007). The Legitimacy of the People. Political Theory, 5, 624– 657.
Putnam, D. R. & Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R. (2001). Cum funcţionează democraţia? Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
Sartori, G. (1999). Teoria democraţiei reinterpretată. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
Sartori, G. (2008). Ingineria constituţională comparată. Iaşi: Editura Institutul European.
Shannon, C.E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656.
Tertytchnaya, K. & Lankina, T. (2020). Electoral Protests and Political Attitudes under Electoral Authoritarianism. Journal of Politics, 82, (1), 285-299.
Zakaria, F. (1997). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76, (6), 22-43.
