Several directions from natural sciences interfere with political research. Political behaviour and political cognition are tested through neuroimaging techniques. If we agree that political science is a science of political behaviour, all these epistemological and methodological directions will change the traditional manner of explaining society and politics. Political attitudes and behaviour are measured directly through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for identifying correlations between brain activity and political cognition. Thus, we can focus on two kinds of behaviours: polarized values and ideology (with a high level of neural activity in medial prefrontal cortex) and political novices (with a very low level of neural activity in prefrontal cortex). Political cognition is a hybrid cognitive model based on several rational elements and emotional responses. All these emotional responses reflect the necessity of understanding political behaviour using an interdisciplinary approach between political sciences, psychology and other disciplines from the field of clinical studies.


Political Sciences, political behaviour, Political Psychology, “hot cognition”, Neurosciences


Amodio, D.M. & Jost, T. J. & Master, S. L. & Yee, C.M. (2007). Neurocognitive Correlates of Liberalism and Conservatism. Nature - Neuroscience, Volume 10, Number 10, October.

Arcuri, L.& Castelli, L.& Galdi, S. & Zogmaister, C. & Amadori, A. (2008). Predicting the Vote: Implicit Attitudes as Predictors of the Future Behaviour of Decided and Undecided Voters. Political Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 3.

Cottam, M.& Dietz- Uhler B.& Mastors E.M. & Preston. T. (2004). Introduction to Political Psychology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

De Sutter, P. (2007). Aceşti nebuni care ne guvernează, Cum ne ajută psihologia să-i ȋnţelegem pe politicieni. Bucureşti: Editura Tritonic.

Deutsch, M.& Kinnvall, C. (2002). What is Political Psychology? in Renwick Monroe, K. (Ed). Political Psychology. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Elff, M. (2009). Social Divisions, Party Positions, and Electoral Behaviour. Electoral Studies, No. 28.

Elster, J. (1993). Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fowler, J.H. & Schreiber, D. (2008). Biology, Politics and the Emerging Science of Human Nature. Science, Vol. 322, November.

Houghton, D.P. (2009). Political Psychology, Situations, Individuals and Cases. London & New York: Routledge.

Iluţ, P. (2004). Atitudini şi Comportamente Sociale, Teme Actuale de Psihosociologie. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.

Jost, J.T. & Sidanius, J. (2005). Political Psychology. New York: Psychology Press.

Kanai, R.& Feilde, T.& Firth, C.& Rees, G. (2011). Political Orientation are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults. Current Biology, Vol. 21, No. 8, April.

Kandel, E. & Schwartz S.J. & Jessel, T.M. (2000). Principles of Neural Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill Companies.

Lazarsfeld, P.F. & Berelson, B. & Gaudet, H. (1948). in Antunes, R. Theoretical Models of Voting Behaviour. Exedera, No.4, 2010.

Lazarsfeld, P.F. et al. (1968). in Antunes, R. Theoretical Models of Voting Behaviour. Exedera, No.4, 2010.

Mc Dougall, W. (2001). An Introduction to Social Psychology. Ontario: Batoche Books.

Newton, K. & Wan Deth, J. (2009). Comparative Politics. Interests, Identities and Institutions in a Changing Global Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rowden, J. & Lloyd, D. & Gilbert, N. (2014). A Model of Political Voting Behaviours Across Different Countries. in Phisica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol.413, Issue C.

Sputtek, R. (2011). Opening the Black-Box. The Role of Personality and Anger in Executive’s Decision Making and Leadership. Viesbaden: Springer Gabler.

Visser, M. (1996). Voting: A Behavioral Analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, Volume 6, No.1, Spring.


  • There are currently no refbacks.