INTRODUCTORY ELEMENTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF DISSIDENTSHIP. A DIACHRONIC PERSPECTIVE IN FORMER COMMUNIST COUNTRIES.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/asas-2025-2-835Abstract
Abstract. The issue of dissidence, as it evolved in the former communist countries, can contribute to defining a complex social phenomenon because even if a relatively small number of elites were more exposed, in reality, entire masses of people tacitly agreed with the opposition to the political regimes in those countries, the stake being, in fact, the transition to democracy. The resistance was rather moral and ethical, focused on respecting human rights and much less on violent actions of social change. From the outside, the Helsinki Accords of 1975 also had an increased importance. The complexity of the dissidence phenomenon comes from the diversity of the social groups involved: intellectuals from literary or scientific fields, groups of whistleblowers regarding the respect of human rights, certain religious groups, or bodies specific to economic activity (unions). Relatively small groups of opponents had a significant social impact through the force of the messages they transmitted, by creating a ‘parallel society’ of openness, by encouraging social change, and by providing a new elite capable of managing broad social reforms. This article proposes a complex approach to the phenomenon of dissidence, starting from the definition of the phenomenon, the analysis of its historical evolution, and insisting on the role of elites, but also on the social dimension of an important phenomenon of recent history.
References
Andreescu, G. (2009). L am urât pe Ceaușescu. Ani, oameni, disidență. Polirom.
Andreescu, G. (2015). Existența prin cultură. Polirom.
Bălănescu, F. (2020). Opoziție/disidență în România comunistă (o propunere de lectură fără pretenții exhaustive). In Corobca, L. (ed.), Panorama comunismului în România, Polirom.
Brozek, M. (2022). School during communism, a class struggle? The private and the public sphere in the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic 1960 1968, preprint, find on link https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362910763_School_during_communism_a_class struggle_The_private_and_the_public_sphere_in_the_Czechoslovak_Socialist_Republic_1960 1968
Budraitskis, I. (2022). Dissidents among Dissidents. Ideology, Politics and the Left in Post Soviet Russia. Verso.
Cătănuș, A. M. (2011). Breaking the barriers of Romanian conformism. Dissent and scientific critique of Communism in mathematician Mihai Botez’s thinking. A case study. In History of Communism in Europe 2 (p. 345-368).
Cătănuș, A. M. (2014). Vocaţia libertăţii. Forme de disidenţă în România anilor 1970 1980. Institutul Național pentru Studiul Totalitarismului.
Deleanu, S. (2015), Anticommunism, Dissidence And Resistance In Four Popular Democracies: Romania, Poland, Hungary And Czechoslovakia. In Multidisciplinary Research Journal Vol. VII, no. 2 (p. 59 70).
Feinberg, J. G. (2022). Post dissent and the New Right: Problems and Potential of post Communist Dissent in Slovakia and Beyond. In The Political Economy of Eastern Europe, 30 years into the „Transition”. New Left Perspectives from the Region (pp.151 167). Palgrave Macmillan.
Glasius, M. (2012). Dissident writings as political theory on civil society and democracy. In Review of International Studies, 38(2) (p. 343 364). https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0260210511000155
Glazunova, S. (2020). „Four Populisms” of Alexey Navalny: An Analysis of Russian Non Systemic Opposition Discourse on YouTube. In Media and Communication, Volume 8 (p. 121–132). DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i4.3169.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
Habermas, J. (2005). Sfera publică și transformarea ei structurală. Comunicare.ro.
Havel, V. (1978). The Power of the Powerless.
Judt, T. (2008). Epoca postbelică. O istorie a Europei de după 1945. Polirom.
Koranyi, J. (2023). Opposing Memories: Contest and Conspiracy over 1970s Romania. In East Central Europe 50 (p. 37-59).
Kornai, J. (1992). The Soft Dictatorship. In The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism (p. 378-412). Princeton University Press.
Milosz, C. (1999). Gândirea captivă. Humanitas.
Paica, A. M. R. (2011). Disidenţa în regimul comunist în România. Studiu de caz – Doina Cornea. In Research and Science Today.
Petrescu, C., Petrescu, D. (2007). Resistance and dissent under communism: the case of Romania. In Totalitarismus und Demokratie, 4(2) (p. 323 346). https://nbn resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168 ssoar 311056
Walesa, L. (2012). Sur les ailes de la liberté. Parole et silence.
